On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > On May 20, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Robby Findler wrote: > >> Would it make sense to have a new construct, say letrec-super-star, >> that did one of those things and then use that as the core form in >> Racket (that's also a big change, but probably smaller than changing >> letrec itself). > > > One day we should reduce the language not just add to it. > > A language is not only about the positive things you can say but also about > the negative ones.
Sorry-- I meant removing/changing the current letrec in the fully expanded language. Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
