On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > At Fri, 20 May 2011 10:55:36 -0500, Robby Findler wrote: >> Can we really change the semantics of letrec in such a fundamental way? > > Sure. :) But it's easier to not change `letrec', of course. > >
:) Sorry; I meant: "if we make this change will we be able to release a working system in the next N years or will it take that long to iron out the bugs (and so we'll release only mostly working systems for those next N years)." Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
