Yesterday, Robby Findler wrote:
> Also, when I disable cookies, I see that the context sensitive
> search just silently doesn't work.
>
> Would it be possible to always have the search set a (separate)
> cookie and give a warning if it doesn't find the (constant) cookie?
I think that it's far more likely that JS fails, so you won't see any
warning anyway.
As for a warning when chrome prevents storing a cookie, I remember
trying that and IIRC it can't even tell when you're not allowed to
store a cookie.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
