On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Eli Barzilay <[email protected]> wrote: > Yesterday, Robby Findler wrote: >> Also, when I disable cookies, I see that the context sensitive >> search just silently doesn't work. >> >> Would it be possible to always have the search set a (separate) >> cookie and give a warning if it doesn't find the (constant) cookie? > > I think that it's far more likely that JS fails, so you won't see any > warning anyway.
JS could also hide a warning that JS wasn't available, right? > As for a warning when chrome prevents storing a cookie, I remember > trying that and IIRC it can't even tell when you're not allowed to > store a cookie. Yeah, I can see how they'd set things up like that. Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
