On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Eli Barzilay <[email protected]> wrote: > 25 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Eli Barzilay <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Yesterday, Robby Findler wrote: >> >> Also, when I disable cookies, I see that the context sensitive >> >> search just silently doesn't work. >> >> >> >> Would it be possible to always have the search set a (separate) >> >> cookie and give a warning if it doesn't find the (constant) >> >> cookie? >> > >> > I think that it's far more likely that JS fails, so you won't see >> > any warning anyway. >> >> JS could also hide a warning that JS wasn't available, right? > > Well, if there's no JS, then JS can't warn you about it. There's the > `noscript' tag, which is there for pages that use it, I think.
Huh? I think you misunderstood me or something. I'm saying this: put a warning on the plain html page. Hve JS hide the warning via css properties. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
