On 2012-06-15 15:12:05 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > I've attached a patch that implements this. Any comments?
Just realized after I sent it that I'd change two things in the patch: * `syntax-null?`, `syntax-pair?`, `syntax-list?` would be defined using `procedure-rename` to get better contract error messages. * the `#:rest` contract is wrong, it'd really be `(listof syntax-list?)` And of course there'd be documentation in the final version too. Cheers, Asumu _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev