On 2012-06-15 17:39:27 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > Sounds like this should be documented and possibly even contracted.
The contracts I wrote in the patch do reflect this via the `stx-pair?` predicate, FYI. By the way, the definition of a syntax pair in the documentation is this: A syntax pair is a pair containing a syntax object as its first element, and either the empty list, a syntax pair, or a syntax object as its second element. I may just be confused, but doesn't this conflict with the documented behavior of the `stx-pair?` predicate? Returns #t if v is either a pair or a syntax object representing a pair (see syntax pair). Cheers, Asumu _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
