On 2012-06-15 15:09:15 -0600, Ryan Culpepper wrote: > The 'stx-*' functions work on values that aren't syntax objects, so > renaming them to 'syntax-*' would be misleading.
Is that really so misleading though? There is already precedent for functions which take arguments not exactly matching their prefix. `list-ref` works on non-`list?` things, for example. Other examples include `syntax-local-module-exports`, `syntax-local-make-delta-introducer`, `syntax-local-module-required-identifiers`, and so on. > 'syntax->list' already exists and means something different from > 'stx->list'. This could be `syntax-list->list` instead maybe. Cheers, Asumu _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
