Yesterday, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> 
> I don't think that will work right in the long run. There's
> currently no easy query to get all of the subcollections of a given
> collection.
> 
> Instead of looking for subcollections of "games", I think
> `games/main' should find all "info.rkt"s that have a `game'
> definition (via `find-relevant-directories').

+8 for this, and also I think that it applies for other path-based
conventions like tests and scribblings.  (And that leads me back to
the specification of these things in info files, of course.)

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
_________________________
  Racket Developers list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

Reply via email to