> On 十二月 1, 2022, 7:34 a.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
> > agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/model/RangerServiceResource.java
> > Lines 45 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/74224/diff/1/?file=2272131#file2272131line45>
> >
> >     Classes in 'model' package are used in REST APIs, hence I suggest to 
> > not make this change unless both client and server require this.

I have updated the code and Re-uploaded the patch file


> On 十二月 1, 2022, 7:34 a.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
> > security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/TagDBStore.java
> > Line 1227 (original), 1244 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/74224/diff/1/?file=2272133#file2272133line1265>
> >
> >     Consider avoiding creation of Lists.newArrayList() in every iteration 
> > by using switch/case, like:
> >     
> >      switch (record.getChangeType()) {
> >        case ServiceTags.TagsChangeType.TAG_UPDATE.ordinal():
> >          tagIds.add(record.getTagId());
> >        break;
> >        
> >        case ServiceTags.TagsChangeType.SERVICE_RESOURCE_CREATE.ordinal():
> >        case ServiceTags.TagsChangeType.SERVICE_RESOURCE_UPDATE.ordinal():
> >        case ServiceTags.TagsChangeType.SERVICE_RESOURCE_DELETE.ordinal():
> >          serviceResourceIds.add(record.getServiceResourceId());
> >        break;
> >        
> >        case ServiceTags.TagsChangeType.TAG_RESOURCE_MAP_CREATE.ordinal():
> >        case ServiceTags.TagsChangeType.TAG_RESOURCE_MAP_UPDATE.ordinal():
> >        case ServiceTags.TagsChangeType.TAG_RESOURCE_MAP_DELETE.ordinal():
> >          tagIds.add(record.getTagId());
> >          serviceResourceIds.add(record.getServiceResourceId());
> >        break;
> >        
> >        default:
> >          if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
> >            LOG.debug("Unknown changeType in tag-change-log record: [" + 
> > record + "]");
> >            LOG.debug("Returning without further processing");
> >     
> >            tagIds.clear();
> >            serviceResourceIds.clear();
> >        break;
> >      }

I have updated the code and Re-uploaded the patch file


- zhou


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/74224/#review224924
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 十二月 1, 2022, 6:47 a.m., zhou feng wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/74224/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 十二月 1, 2022, 6:47 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Gautam Borad, Abhay Kulkarni, Madhan Neethiraj, 
> Nikhil P, Pradeep Agrawal, Ramesh Mani, Selvamohan Neethiraj, Sailaja 
> Polavarapu, and Velmurugan Periasamy.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-3950
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-3950
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fix the change of tag, tag-resource map , service resource is recorded to 
> x_tag_change_log
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-3950
> add the type of change of tag follow : 
>   TAG_RESOURCE_MAP_CREATE , TAG_RESOURCE_MAP_DELETE , SERVICE_RESOURCE_CREATE 
> , SERVICE_RESOURCE_DELETE
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/model/RangerServiceResource.java
>  b7cf7cebb 
>   agents-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/plugin/util/ServiceTags.java 
> 9b902789a 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/biz/TagDBStore.java 
> e434cf1bb 
>   
> security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/service/RangerServiceResourceServiceBase.java
>  329d3eeec 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/74224/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested the below Rest API's to make sure everything works fine
> 1.POST   /service/tags/tags
> 2.PUT    /service/tag/guid/{guid}
> 3.DELETE  /service/tag/{id}
> 4.POST   /service/resources
> 5.PUT    /service/resource/{id}
> 6.DELETE  /service/resource/{id}
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> zhou feng
> 
>

Reply via email to