> On Sept. 17, 2024, 5:15 a.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
> > security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/rest/GdsREST.java
> > Line 1040 (original), 1044 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/75208/diff/1/?file=2293268#file2293268line1044>
> >
> >     I suggest to retain existing implementation in addSharedResource() and 
> > removeSharedResource() i.e. don't forward to the new method with a 
> > singleton collection.
> 
> Radhika Kundam wrote:
>     To avoid redundancy, I tried to keep the logic for adding shared 
> resources in one place, either in addSharedResource() or 
> addSharedResources(). If I keep the logic in addSharedResource() as 
> suggested, it will print logs for each individual resource in debug mode, 
> which could result in an excessive amount of logs.
>     
>     By moving the logic to a common method that can be called by both 
> addSharedResource() and addSharedResources(), we avoid this issue, but it 
> unnecessarily increases complexity, where the current code in patch handling 
> the same.
>     
>     Please let me know if the increased number of debug logs per resource is 
> acceptable, and I’ll proceed with the suggested changes accordingly.

ok. I was trying to keep the perf traces for both methods, batch and single, 
separate.


> On Sept. 17, 2024, 5:15 a.m., Madhan Neethiraj wrote:
> > security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/rest/GdsREST.java
> > Line 1044 (original), 1068 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/75208/diff/1/?file=2293268#file2293268line1068>
> >
> >     It may not be useful to print perf log for every iteration. Consider 
> > replacing with the following:
> >     
> >     
> >     try {
> >         if(RangerPerfTracer.isPerfTraceEnabled(PERF_LOG)) {
> >             perf = RangerPerfTracer.getPerfTracer(PERF_LOG, 
> > "GdsREST.addSharedResource(" + resource + ")");
> >         }
> >         
> >         for (RangerSharedResource resource : resources) {
> >             ret.add(gdsStore.addSharedResource(resource));
> >         }
> >     } catch(WebApplicationException excp) {
> >         throw excp;
> >     } catch(Throwable excp) {
> >         LOG.error("addSharedResources({}) failed", resources, excp);
> >     
> >         throw restErrorUtil.createRESTException(excp.getMessage());
> >     } finally {
> >         RangerPerfTracer.log(perf);
> >     }
> >     
> >     Similar update for removeSharedResources() as well.
> 
> Radhika Kundam wrote:
>     Sure, I'll move the perf log out of the for loop as suggested. However, 
> enclosing the entire loop in a try-catch block makes it harder to identify 
> which specific resource caused an exception during the addition. The catch 
> block would only provide details about all resources processed, not the 
> specific one that failed. Please let me know your thoughts on this.

How about declaring 'resource' outside the try block?


- Madhan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/75208/#review226916
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 16, 2024, 7:14 p.m., Radhika Kundam wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/75208/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 16, 2024, 7:14 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for ranger, Madhan Neethiraj and Ramesh Mani.
> 
> 
> Bugs: RANGER-4934
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-4934
> 
> 
> Repository: ranger
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Ranger API to add and delete assets to the DataShare in bulk. Current API 
> accepts only one resource and has to support adding / deleting multiple 
> resources.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   security-admin/src/main/java/org/apache/ranger/rest/GdsREST.java b1a00533e 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/75208/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested manually.
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> API details
>   
> https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2024/09/16/a4540abb-1c2d-471e-bbd3-eb74a8756159__Multiple_resources_add_delete_API_details.json
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Radhika Kundam
> 
>

Reply via email to