Hi Marton, Thanks the suggestions, I'm okay to release ratis 2.0.0 first. After release 2.0, I will also release ratis 1.1, so that other application, such as Alluxio, can use ratis 1.1.
Thanks, runzhiwang Elek, Marton <[email protected]> 于2021年2月2日周二 下午6:16写道： > > Yesterday we had a long conversation about Ratis release during the > Ozone community call [1]: > > 1. We think that the easiest way to release is Ozone to release Ratis > master as Ratis 2.0 (full branch, without cherry-picking) > > 2. All the new features can be turned off by default (like PRE_VOTE > and leader lease). Either by default on Ratis, or just by the Ozone. > (follow HDDS-4774) > > 3. Compatibility will be tested by acceptance tests (thx to Attila we > will have a test to test current Ozone with older clients). > > > From this point of view, Ozone needs 2.0 release from master. > > runzhiwang: you are volunteered to be an RM for 1.1. Do you need a > stable 1.1 release, or you would do it for Ozone. > > If it's for Ozone, can we do 2.0 instead? > > (I am happy to help in any release which moves us closer to the Ozone > release). > > Thanks, > Marton > > > > > > > [1]: in the first 30 mins > > > https://cloudera.zoom.us/rec/share/4S9Uf7etdbpwDWDWvnj3J0Af2TnZhbB7ruFavE4T0ucLKinclxa7x87dBZdYjgUE.HIacLrBnWPsnNmaZ > > Passcode: $PS1wQ.N >
