I didn't join the community call thus may not know enough context. > It is odd that 2.0 is expected to be more stable than 1.1 when 2.0 should be a superset of 1.1. so I have the same question as Arpit.
-Rui On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 7:36 AM Arpit Agarwal <[email protected]> wrote: > Which version of Ratis will Ozone 1.1 use? > > It is odd that 2.0 is expected to be more stable than 1.1 when 2.0 should > be a superset of 1.1. > > Thanks, > Arpit > > > On Feb 2, 2021, at 3:35 AM, runzhiwang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I agree, I will release ratis 2.0.0 first. > > > > Thanks, > > runzhiwang > > > > Shashikant Banerjee <[email protected]> 于2021年2月2日周二 > 下午7:33写道： > > > >> Let's get ratis 2.0.0 out first. Ratis 1.1 may require some more testing > >> for stability. > >> > >> Thanks @runzhiwang(王杰) <[email protected]> for volunteering for > the > >> same. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Shashi > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 4:44 PM runzhiwang <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Marton, > >>> > >>> Thanks the suggestions, I'm okay to release ratis 2.0.0 first. After > >>> release 2.0, I will also release ratis 1.1, so that other application, > >> such > >>> as Alluxio, can use ratis 1.1. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> runzhiwang > >>> > >>> Elek, Marton <[email protected]> 于2021年2月2日周二 下午6:16写道： > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Yesterday we had a long conversation about Ratis release during the > >>>> Ozone community call [1]: > >>>> > >>>> 1. We think that the easiest way to release is Ozone to release Ratis > >>>> master as Ratis 2.0 (full branch, without cherry-picking) > >>>> > >>>> 2. All the new features can be turned off by default (like PRE_VOTE > >>>> and leader lease). Either by default on Ratis, or just by the Ozone. > >>>> (follow HDDS-4774) > >>>> > >>>> 3. Compatibility will be tested by acceptance tests (thx to Attila we > >>>> will have a test to test current Ozone with older clients). > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> From this point of view, Ozone needs 2.0 release from master. > >>>> > >>>> runzhiwang: you are volunteered to be an RM for 1.1. Do you need a > >>>> stable 1.1 release, or you would do it for Ozone. > >>>> > >>>> If it's for Ozone, can we do 2.0 instead? > >>>> > >>>> (I am happy to help in any release which moves us closer to the Ozone > >>>> release). > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Marton > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> [1]: in the first 30 mins > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://cloudera.zoom.us/rec/share/4S9Uf7etdbpwDWDWvnj3J0Af2TnZhbB7ruFavE4T0ucLKinclxa7x87dBZdYjgUE.HIacLrBnWPsnNmaZ > >>>> > >>>> Passcode: $PS1wQ.N > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
