> It is odd that 2.0 is expected to be more stable than 1.1 when 2.0 should > be a superset of 1.1.
My understanding is that current Ratis master (to become 2.0) is more extensively tested in "production" via Ozone. Ratis 1.1 may be more stable feature-wise, but there is an uncertainty factor because fixes still need to be cherry-picked and integration tested. In the future I think it would be better to establish a maintenance branch from which snapshots could be released for Ozone. This would let Ozone to take critical fixes in a timely manner without becoming dependent on the in-development version including new API etc. -Attila
