Hi William, Thanks for understanding! I have launched a vote for ratis-thirdparty 1.0.1-rc0, I hope you can help verify and vote when you have time, thanks for your support!
Regards, Yaolong Liu > 2022年6月25日 上午9:26，William Song <[email protected]> 写道： > > Hi, > > Thanks for all the work to release 2.3.1! We are expecting to release 0.14.0 > very soon, and we decide to depend on Ratis2.3.0 temporarily. So please take > your time on releasing 2.3.1~ > > Regards, > William Song > >> 2022年6月25日 01:27，yaolongliu <[email protected]> 写道： >> >> Hi Tsz-Wo, >> >> I tried to release ratis-third-party 1.0.1, but I found a lot of CI test >> exceptions, I am investigating whether it is related to the changes of >> RATIS-1591, can you also help take a look? see >> https://github.com/codings-dan/incubator-ratis/actions/runs/2556846940 >> >> Regards, >> Yaolong Liu >> >>> 2022年6月21日 上午11:09，Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> 写道： >>> >>> Hi Yaolong, >>> >>> That's great! Thanks a lot. Please feel free to reach out for help. >>> Attila just has done both Ratis Thirdparty Release 1.0.0 and Ratis Release >>> 2.3.0 so that he must be very familiar with the process. You may >>> start with checking the make_rc scripts: >>> >>> - >>> https://github.com/apache/ratis-thirdparty/blob/master/dev-support/make_rc.sh >>> - https://github.com/apache/ratis/blob/master/dev-support/make_rc.sh >>> >>> This is a discussion thread for 2.3.0. It has some useful information >>> inside. >>> - https://lists.apache.org/thread/fdkg3gg8rfmz9t695zpw9ct41vftcjbp >>> >>> Tsz-Wo >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 7:13 PM yaolongliu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Tsz-Wo, >>>> >>>> I am very willing to serve as the 2.3.1 release manager to help complete >>>> this task. Since it is my first time participating, I will learn the >>>> release process first. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Yaolong Liu >>>> >>>>> 2022年6月20日 下午10:35，Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> 写道： >>>>> >>>>> Sure. Since it requires committer access to be a release manager, I >>>> wonder >>>>> if Yaolong likes to be the 2.3.1 release manager? >>>>> >>>>> BTW, we should also release ratis-thirdparty 1.0.1 due to >>>>> RATIS-1591 (CVE-2022-24823). >>>>> >>>>> Tsz-Wo >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 6:50 PM William Song <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Tsz-Wo, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! Is there anything we can do to help? >>>>>> >>>>>>> 2022年6月18日 23:44，Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> 写道： >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi William, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Since there is a need, we could start preparing the Ratis-2.3.1 >>>> release. >>>>>>> Let's first merge the new changes from the master branch to branch-2. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Tsz-Wo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 2:44 AM William Song <[email protected] >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What’s the community’s plan on release Ratis-2.3.1 version? Apache >>>> IoTDB >>>>>>>> plan to release a major version 0.14.0 by June 30, while current >>>>>> dependency >>>>>>>> Ratis-2.3.0 have some snapshot bugs that affects the multi-chunk >>>>>> snapshot >>>>>>>> scenario (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1587 < >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1587 < >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1587>> and >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ratis/pull/655 < >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ratis/pull/655> < >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ratis/pull/655 < >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ratis/pull/655>> for detail). >>>>>>>> Therefore, we are hoping that the community can release Ratis-2.3.1 >>>>>>>> version and we are happy to help. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best Wishes, >>>>>>>> William Song >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>
