Hi Tsz-Wo,
I'll finish RATIS-1612 in the near future, it's not that urgent right now, so I think we can hold off on finishing the 2.3.1 release. Regards. Yaolong Liu At 2022-07-07 03:27:40, "Tsz Wo Sze" <[email protected]> wrote: >Also, if we are not in a hurry, we should also complete >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1612 and include it in 2.3.1. >Otherwise, the Listener feature is hard to use. > >Tsz-Wo > > >On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 10:30 AM Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Yaolong, >> >> Just found that we have not yet removed the dropwizard dependencies. We >> should remove all the dropwizard dependencies and change all the imports to >> org.apache.ratis.thirdparty.com.codahale.metrics.*; see >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1601 >> >> Tsz-Wo >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 5:43 AM Yaolong Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Ratis Thirdparty 1.0.1 has been released, and Ratis master branch >>> upgraded to it. We can proceed with Ratis 2.3.1 release. >>> >>> I will release based on branch-2. Since there have been many changes >>> recently, >>> I want to release based on RATIS-1614 and all previous commits. >>> If there are any that should not appear in 2.3.1, please let me know. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Yaolong Liu >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> At 2022-06-18 17:44:27, "William Song" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >Hi all, >>> > >>> >What’s the community’s plan on release Ratis-2.3.1 version? Apache IoTDB >>> plan to release a major version 0.14.0 by June 30, while current dependency >>> Ratis-2.3.0 have some snapshot bugs that affects the multi-chunk snapshot >>> scenario (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1587 < >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1587> and >>> https://github.com/apache/ratis/pull/655 < >>> https://github.com/apache/ratis/pull/655> for detail). >>> >Therefore, we are hoping that the community can release Ratis-2.3.1 >>> version and we are happy to help. >>> > >>> >Best Wishes, >>> >William Song >>> >>
