Also, if we are not in a hurry, we should also complete https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1612 and include it in 2.3.1. Otherwise, the Listener feature is hard to use.
Tsz-Wo On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 10:30 AM Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Yaolong, > > Just found that we have not yet removed the dropwizard dependencies. We > should remove all the dropwizard dependencies and change all the imports to > org.apache.ratis.thirdparty.com.codahale.metrics.*; see > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1601 > > Tsz-Wo > > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 5:43 AM Yaolong Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Ratis Thirdparty 1.0.1 has been released, and Ratis master branch >> upgraded to it. We can proceed with Ratis 2.3.1 release. >> >> I will release based on branch-2. Since there have been many changes >> recently, >> I want to release based on RATIS-1614 and all previous commits. >> If there are any that should not appear in 2.3.1, please let me know. >> >> >> Regards, >> Yaolong Liu >> >> >> >> >> >> At 2022-06-18 17:44:27, "William Song" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >Hi all, >> > >> >What’s the community’s plan on release Ratis-2.3.1 version? Apache IoTDB >> plan to release a major version 0.14.0 by June 30, while current dependency >> Ratis-2.3.0 have some snapshot bugs that affects the multi-chunk snapshot >> scenario (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1587 < >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1587> and >> https://github.com/apache/ratis/pull/655 < >> https://github.com/apache/ratis/pull/655> for detail). >> >Therefore, we are hoping that the community can release Ratis-2.3.1 >> version and we are happy to help. >> > >> >Best Wishes, >> >William Song >> >
