Hi Maksim, Thanks a lot for using Apache Ratis and Ozone!
Unfortunately, the Apache policy requires committers to serve as a release manager; sorry about that. - https://infra.apache.org/release-publishing.html#releasemanager Tsz-Wo On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 11:59 AM Maksim Myskov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Apache Ratis devs, > > I actively use Apache Ozone and Ratis in my work, so highly interested in > the development of these two projects. > I’m not an official apache committer (I don’t have account on id.apche.org). > If possible, I would love to be a release manager this time. > > > On 1 Nov 2022, at 07:48, Tsz Wo Sze <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Let's start to roll thirdparty 1.0.3 and ratis 2.4.1 releases. Does > anyone > > like to be the release manager? > > > > Tsz-Wo > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 10:58 PM Yaolong Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi William, > >> > >> > >> Thanks for starting a discussion on 2.4.1! +1 on rolling a 2.4.1 > release. > >> > >> > >> -Yaolong > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> At 2022-10-25 19:20:32, "William Song" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Hi Ratis Community, > >>> > >>> It’s really great to see Ratis releases 2.4.0. Unfortunately, there are > >> some important fixes missing in 2.4.0, like RATIS-1708 and RATIS-1729. > >>> > >>> I would like to propose a new Ratis release 2.4.1 (including > >> ratis-thirdparty 1.0.3) with the above changes. Since Apache IoTDB 1.0 > >> release (frozen by 11.15) is waiting for Ratis, we would be really > >> appreciate if the 2.4.1 be released in the coming weeks. > >>> > >>> Please help me check if there are other commits missing in 2.4.0. > Thanks > >> in advance! > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> William > >> > > >
