It depends whether you expect to make a 0.21.1 release of the project before this weekend. If you do, wait with the master pom and do a combined release. Otherwise create a new release of only the master pom and start a vote for it asap.
If you expect to do a 0.21.1 release of the project within ±72 hours from now, On 9 April 2013 17:05, Raminder Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > I am checking again. Is it ok to send a rave master release without Erin's > name committed to the pom? He committed it now but its not part of the tag. > Do we want to do 0.21.1 for master also. > > Thanks > Raminder > On Apr 6, 2013, at 6:58 PM, Erin Noe-Payne wrote: > > > I've gone ahead and added my name & committed. > > > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Raminder Singh <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I moved to discussion thread. > >> > >> You can checkout > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/rave/rave-master-pom/trunk and add your > info to pom. I am not sure if its required for the release. Just want to > check with others before start the vote thread for master. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Raminder > >> > >> On Apr 5, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Erin Noe-Payne wrote: > >> > >>> Sure. What do I need to do? > >>> > >>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Raminder Singh < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> I just noticed, Erin is still not added to master pom as committer > and PMC. Do we want to do that before 0.21 master release? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> Raminder > >>>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 4 April 2013 22:32, Chris Geer <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Matt Franklin < > [email protected] > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think we should keep going with the master pom release. We will > need > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>> close the current repository and re-create the staging with just > the pom > >>>>>>> artifact, but there should be no reason why we can't release that > >>>>>>> separately while we wait for the 0.21.1 project release to get > ready to > >>>>>> go. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 - That will greatly simplify the 0.21.1 release anyway. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Please start a new vote then for the master pom. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Raminderjeet Singh < > [email protected] > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Vote is canceled. There are issues with mongodb backend and few > other > >>>>>>>> issues reported on JIRA and dev list. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Raminder Singh < > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I've created a combined 0.21 release candidate, with the > >>>>>>>>> following artifacts up for a vote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> SVN source tag (r1463751): > >>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/rave/rave-master-pom/tags/0.21 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> SVN source tag (r1463817): > >>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/rave/tags/0.21 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Maven staging repo: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-054/ > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Source releases: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-054/org/apache/rave/rave-master/0.21/rave-master-0.21-source-release.zip > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherave-054/org/apache/rave/rave-project/0.21/rave-project-0.21-source-release.zip > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Demo Artifacts > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > http://people.apache.org/builds/rave/0.21/apache-rave-0.21-bin.tar.gz > >>>>>>>>> > http://people.apache.org/builds/rave/0.21/apache-rave-0.21-bin.zip > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> PGP release keys (signed using 1BE72138): > >>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/rave/KEYS > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Please take the time to verify the artifacts before casting your > >>>>>> vote. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve > >>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > >>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >> > >
