On Tuesday, April 9, 2013, Raminder Singh wrote: > There are still open issues need to be addressed for 0.21.1 (RAVE-924). I > don't think the release will be in 72 hours. New means creating a new tag > and doing a release or using the existing tag?
The existing tag is what I propose > > > On Apr 9, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal wrote: > > > It depends whether you expect to make a 0.21.1 release of the project > > before this weekend. If you do, wait with the master pom and do a > combined > > release. Otherwise create a new release of only the master pom and start > a > > vote for it asap. > > > > If you expect to do a 0.21.1 release of the project within ±72 hours from > > now, > > > > On 9 April 2013 17:05, Raminder Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I am checking again. Is it ok to send a rave master release without > Erin's > >> name committed to the pom? He committed it now but its not part of the > tag. > >> Do we want to do 0.21.1 for master also. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Raminder > >> On Apr 6, 2013, at 6:58 PM, Erin Noe-Payne wrote: > >> > >>> I've gone ahead and added my name & committed. > >>> > >>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Raminder Singh < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> I moved to discussion thread. > >>>> > >>>> You can checkout > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/rave/rave-master-pom/trunk and add > your > >> info to pom. I am not sure if its required for the release. Just want to > >> check with others before start the vote thread for master. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> Raminder > >>>> > >>>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Erin Noe-Payne wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Sure. What do I need to do? > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Raminder Singh < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> I just noticed, Erin is still not added to master pom as committer > >> and PMC. Do we want to do that before 0.21 master release? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>> Raminder > >>>>>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 4 April 2013 22:32, Chris Geer <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Matt Franklin < > >> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I think we should keep going with the master pom release. We > will > >> need > >>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> close the current repository and re-create the staging with just > >> the pom > >>>>>>>>> artifact, but there should be no reason why we can't release that > >>>>>>>>> separately while we wait for the 0.21.1 project release to get > >> ready to > >>>>>>>> go. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 - That will greatly simplify the 0.21.1 release anyway. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Please start a new vote then for the master pom. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Raminderjeet Singh < > >> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Vote is canceled. There are issues with mongodb backend and few > >> other > >>>>>>>>>> issues reported on JIRA and dev list. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Raminder Singh < > >>>>>>>>
