On 9 April 2013 17:15, Matt Franklin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 9, 2013, Jasha Joachimsthal wrote: > > > It depends whether you expect to make a 0.21.1 release of the project > > before this weekend. If you do, wait with the master pom and do a > combined > > release. Otherwise create a new release of only the master pom and start > a > > vote for it asap. > > > I think Ate proposed that the developer metadata in master Pom be > considered less important. The DOAP file should be kept up to date though. > > No offense to Erin, but I say make a release now. > You can't release without votes, right? And there hasn't been a separate vote for the master pom yet. > > > > > > If you expect to do a 0.21.1 release of the project within ±72 hours from > > now, > > > > On 9 April 2013 17:05, Raminder Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I am checking again. Is it ok to send a rave master release without > > Erin's > > > name committed to the pom? He committed it now but its not part of the > > tag. > > > Do we want to do 0.21.1 for master also. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Raminder > > > On Apr 6, 2013, at 6:58 PM, Erin Noe-Payne wrote: > > > > > > > I've gone ahead and added my name & committed. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Raminder Singh < > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >> I moved to discussion thread. > > > >> > > > >> You can checkout > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/rave/rave-master-pom/trunk and add > your > > > info to pom. I am not sure if its required for the release. Just want > to > > > check with others before start the vote thread for master. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks > > > >> Raminder > > > >> > > > >> On Apr 5, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Erin Noe-Payne wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Sure. What do I need to do? > > > >>> > > > >>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Raminder Singh < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >>>> I just noticed, Erin is still not added to master pom as committer > > > and PMC. Do we want to do that before 0.21 master release? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks > > > >>>> Raminder > > > >>>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Jasha Joachimsthal wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> On 4 April 2013 22:32, Chris Geer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Matt Franklin < > > > [email protected] > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> I think we should keep going with the master pom release. We > > will > > > need > > > >>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>> close the current repository and re-create the staging with > just > > > the pom > > > >>>>>>> artifact, but there should be no reason why we can't release > that > > > >>>>>>> separately while we wait for the 0.21.1 project release to get > > > ready to > > > >>>>>> go. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> +1 - That will greatly simplify the 0.21.1 release anyway. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Please start a new vote then for the master pom. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Raminderjeet Singh < > > > [email protected] > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Vote is canceled. There are issues with mongodb backend and > few > > > other > > > >>>>>>>> issues reported on JIRA and dev list. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Raminder Singh < > > > >>>>>> [email protected] > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> I've created a combined 0.21 release candidate, with the > > > >>>>>>>>> following artifacts up for a vote: > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> SVN source tag (r1463751): > > > >>>>>>>>> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/rave/rave-master-pom/tags/0.21 > > >
