Re: packaging, yeah that split is worthwhile. Suspect there's more but a good start.
Re: JERI, in the short-term possibly, longer-term, I'm not so sure but if someone wants to take it on I have no objection. We can try it and see what happens. Could do that prior to (3) below.... On 14 February 2011 11:53, Sim IJskes - QCG <s...@qcg.nl> wrote: > On 14-02-11 12:45, Dan Creswell wrote: > >> (1) Modular Build >> (2) Packaging (think this is wider and maybe even separate from build) - >> in >> particular stuff like auto-selecting the right IP addresses for multicast >> etc out of the box. >> (3) Overall vision, target audience - lots to talk about there. My >> favourite: How much can we do without mobile code and is that still >> Jini/River? >> (4) Promotion >> >> JERI vs RMI - think I'd wait on (3) for that. Certain outcomes might make >> this a moot point. >> > > Shall we sub-split packaging into 'delivery to the user-developer' and > 'deployment'? > > Still think we can use the JERI functionality to attract visible users. > > > > -- > QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl > Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397 >
