On 13 February 2011 21:11, MICHAEL MCGRADY <mmcgr...@topiatechnology.com>wrote:
> Architecting and developing are such different activities. > > Agreed, but ultimately in architecting, a decision has to be reached, one that may well lead to development; you can't forever talk about an issue and not resolve it, similarly you shouldn't reach a resolution that requires actions to be taken, without taking those actions, or at least planning to take those actions. My point is that River should not completely stay in the area of developing for the now, at the expense of the future, rather that there should be some consideration given to what areas we want to concentrate on for 2.2, 2.3 and even 3.0 whatever those might be. --Calum
