On 25 September 2012 08:46, Simon IJskes - QCG <[email protected]> wrote: > On 25-09-12 09:15, Dan Creswell wrote: > > If we really see value in the above, can we consider providing something >> else that works for an ops team too? (Cos none I've ever come across would >> touch the above with a barge-pole). Or can we at least make it clear what >> mechanisms should be in place for "best practice" (jeez, I hate that >> term). >> > > Glad you introduced ops teams. Would a middle ground be possible? Two > options: A annotation refering to a part in a deployment configuration > file, or using the annotations as defaults, and provide ops team with a > overriding option? > > I was edging towards the latter whilst scribbling the above...
> Gr. Simon > >
