On 25-09-12 11:26, Greg Trasuk wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 04:32, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 25-09-12 09:59, Dan Creswell wrote:
Glad you introduced ops teams. Would a middle ground be possible? Two
options: A annotation refering to a part in a deployment configuration
file, or using the annotations as defaults, and provide ops team with a
overriding option?
I was edging towards the latter whilst scribbling the above...
We need an id to hang overrides onto, so i've created the ServiceClass
annotation. Greg, are you ok with this?
Sure. I suspect we need to flesh out some samples and see how they
look, then edit the "annotation vocabulary".
I've created
<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/jtsk/trunk/netbeans/federation/src/org/apache/river/federation/IntrospectionConfiguration.java?view=markup>.
Would this be too much encapsulation? It would be nice if we had some
kind of introspection information collector where we can put all
annotation parsing.
--
QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl
Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397
