On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 04:32, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote: > On 25-09-12 09:59, Dan Creswell wrote: > >> Glad you introduced ops teams. Would a middle ground be possible? Two > >> options: A annotation refering to a part in a deployment configuration > >> file, or using the annotations as defaults, and provide ops team with a > >> overriding option? > > I was edging towards the latter whilst scribbling the above... > > We need an id to hang overrides onto, so i've created the ServiceClass > annotation. Greg, are you ok with this? > >
Sure. I suspect we need to flesh out some samples and see how they look, then edit the "annotation vocabulary". Greg. > >
