M*e*memto, I presume ;-) Otherwise, no objections from me - very fitting considering the role of the class.
On 26/06/2014 12:53, Peter wrote: > Any objections to calling it Momento? > > ----- Original message ----- >> You're sharp, so it is, that's a good one. >> >> ----- Original message ----- >>> It really is a Memento. Isn't it? >>> >>> Michal >>> 23 cze 2014 13:24 "Peter Firmstone" <j...@zeus.net.au> napisał(a): >>> >>>> Distributed object use SerialReflectionFactory to recreate themselves >>>> remotely using one of their public constructors, a static factory >>>> method or builder object, however one thing about >>>> SerialReflectionFactory bothers me. >>>> >>>> SerialReflectionFactory is named after it's implementation, that is, >>>> it uses reflection. At some point in time, we might decide we want >>>> to use something other than reflection, in that case, the name would >>>> be inappropriate. >>>> >>>> How does DistributedObjectFactory sound? >>>> >>>> Has anyone got a better name? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Peter. >>>> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature