Distributed object use SerialReflectionFactory to recreate themselves
remotely using one of their public constructors, a static factory method
or builder object, however one thing about SerialReflectionFactory
bothers me.
SerialReflectionFactory is named after it's implementation, that is, it
uses reflection. At some point in time, we might decide we want to use
something other than reflection, in that case, the name would be
inappropriate.
How does DistributedObjectFactory sound?
Has anyone got a better name?
Regards,
Peter.
