I agree with the suggested rename to DistributedObjectFactory. Or, you could bring the "recreation" aspect into the name somehow... (I don't have any ideas at present).
regards, Dawid On 23/06/2014 13:24, Peter Firmstone wrote: > Distributed object use SerialReflectionFactory to recreate themselves > remotely using one of their public constructors, a static factory > method or builder object, however one thing about > SerialReflectionFactory bothers me. > > SerialReflectionFactory is named after it's implementation, that is, > it uses reflection. At some point in time, we might decide we want to > use something other than reflection, in that case, the name would be > inappropriate. > > How does DistributedObjectFactory sound? > > Has anyone got a better name? > > Regards, > > Peter.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
