As per previous discussions, I’ve already setup the river-tools repository with a modularized ‘start’ implementation. Perhaps we should bite the bullet and change the infrastructure services to use that when we go to 3.0.
Cheers, Greg Trasuk. On May 1, 2015, at 6:52 AM, Peter <j...@zeus.net.au> wrote: > +1 > > suggestion: > > org.apache.river namespace is split into org.apache.river.api and > org.apache.river.impl as per dev discussions some time ago. > > Also suggest that start is moved into api and discovery constraints moved > into net.jini namespace. > > Pete. > > ----- Original message ----- >> +1 : I approve of this modificationRegardsBishnu >> >> Bishnu Prasad Gautam >> >> >>> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:40:22 -0400 >>> Subject: Re: [Vote] Namespace change from com.sun.jini and com.artima >>> to org.apache.river From: br...@systap.com >>> To: dev@river.apache.org >>> >>> +1 : I approve of this modification >>> On Apr 30, 2015 1:15 PM, "Dennis Reedy" <dennis.re...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> As part of the upcoming 3.0 release (based off of the >>>> skunk/qa_refactor branch), it would be perfect timing to move the >>>> package names of com.sun.jini and com.artima to org.apache.river. >>>> >>>> Voting period will end May 2, 2015 5:00 PM EDT. >>>> >>>> As per http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting, code modifications >>>> require three binding ‘+1’ votes, and no -1 votes. >>>> >>>> Please vote by replying to this thread on the “dev@river.apache.org" >>>> list, with the section below filled out. >>>> >>>> If not voting +1, please provide your reasons why. >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 : I approve of this modification >>>> [ ] +0 >>>> [ ] -0 : >>>> [ ] -1 : I do not approve of this modification (reasoning attached) >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance, >>>> >>>> Dennis Reedy >> >
