The vote for the namespace change from com.sun.jini and com.artima to 
org.apache.river has passed. I’ll begin this work in the skunk/qa_refactor 
branch. I might require assistance in testing, so volunteers would be 
appreciated.

As far as the other suggestions are concerned:

(1) org.apache.river namespace split into org.apache.river.api and 
org.apache.river.impl
(2) modularized ‘start’ implementation

Perhaps #1 can be part of this work, I’d like to first get the project moved 
over to org.apache.river, perhaps a second iteration could make the change for 
org.apache.river.api and org.apache.river.impl. Assistance would be great here 
as well.

I’m not clear on #2, its most likely because I cant find this work in the svn 
repository. If it makes sense, lets do it. I’d just like to see whats been done 
here first.

Regards

Dennis Reedy

> On Apr 30, 2015, at 414PM, Dennis Reedy <den...@asarian-tech.com> wrote:
> 
> As part of the upcoming 3.0 release (based off of the skunk/qa_refactor 
> branch), it would be perfect timing to move the package names of com.sun.jini 
> and com.artima to org.apache.river.
> 
> Voting period will end May 2, 2015 5:00 PM EDT.
> 
> As per http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting, code modifications require 
> three binding ‘+1’ votes, and no -1 votes.
> 
> Please vote by replying to this thread on the “dev@river.apache.org" list, 
> with the section below filled out.
> 
> If not voting +1, please provide your reasons why.  
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> [ ] +1 : I approve of this modification
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0 :
> [ ] -1 : I do not approve of this modification (reasoning attached)
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Dennis Reedy

Reply via email to