I think it is better to do all reorganization in one gulp. That way, any
users who are affected get affected once, and will see a stable
organization going forward.
I'm not sure the details require a second vote now, rather than being
covered by the release vote.
On 5/1/2015 6:39 AM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
As per previous discussions, I’ve already setup the river-tools
repository with a modularized ‘start’ implementation. Perhaps we
should bite the bullet and change the infrastructure services to use
that when we go to 3.0.
Cheers,
Greg Trasuk. On May 1, 2015, at 6:52 AM, Peter <j...@zeus.net.au>
wrote:
+1
suggestion:
org.apache.river namespace is split into org.apache.river.api and
org.apache.river.impl as per dev discussions some time ago.
Also suggest that start is moved into api and discovery constraints
moved into net.jini namespace.
Pete.
----- Original message -----
+1 : I approve of this modificationRegardsBishnu
Bishnu Prasad Gautam
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:40:22 -0400 Subject: Re: [Vote]
Namespace change from com.sun.jini and com.artima to
org.apache.river From: br...@systap.com To:
dev@river.apache.org
+1 : I approve of this modification On Apr 30, 2015 1:15 PM,
"Dennis Reedy" <dennis.re...@gmail.com> wrote:
As part of the upcoming 3.0 release (based off of the
skunk/qa_refactor branch), it would be perfect timing to move
the package names of com.sun.jini and com.artima to
org.apache.river.
Voting period will end May 2, 2015 5:00 PM EDT.
As per http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting, code
modifications require three binding ‘+1’ votes, and no -1
votes.
Please vote by replying to this thread on the
“dev@river.apache.org" list, with the section below filled
out.
If not voting +1, please provide your reasons why.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 : I approve of this modification
[ ] +0 [ ] -0 : [ ] -1 : I do not approve of this
modification (reasoning attached)
Thanks in advance,
Dennis Reedy
