It's the RMIClassLoader work that was done, thought I had made that clear. Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 5, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Greg Trasuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Need to define “run within NetBeans”. I think Gregg’s work you’re thinking > of was about being able to build NetBeans plugins that could access services > and perhaps export services. > > “Running” a program from within Netbeans, i.e. invoking the Ant script or > executing “java …” works fine as-is. And I think Peter was talking about > developing with NetBeans, which also is just fine. The only thing that is > bit of a pain with either NetBeans or Eclipse on the JTSK core project is > getting all the libraries added to the IDE’s class path so that type-ahead, > etc, work OK. In either one, you need to edit the project’s properties. > It’s a little easier with a Mavenized project like the river-examples > projects, because the IDE picks up on the dependencies called out in the POM. > > Cheers, > > Greg Trasuk > >> On Jun 5, 2015, at 9:45 AM, Dennis Reedy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Gregg, >> >> IIRC, you did some work with the RMIClassLoader that greatly improved >> interoperability with NB. I don't recall seeing it in the qa-refactor >> branch. I think it's really important to have that work in the next release. >> >> Any chance you can you merge it into the qa-refactor-namespace branch? >> >> Thanks >> >> Dennis >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Jun 5, 2015, at 9:04 AM, Gregg Wonderly <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Netbeans used to start with a custom SecurityManager implementation which >>> was not replaceable in an APP nor the IDE itself. I think this was changed >>> to be pluggable, but I just don’t remember the details. >>> >>> Gregg >>> >>>> On Jun 2, 2015, at 6:14 AM, Peter <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes, >>>> >>>> Should run fine from within Netbeans,I haven't tried Eclipse, but it >>>> should also work. Unlike previous builds, it doesn't need cigwin and it >>>> builds on jvm's other than Sun's, such as IBM's J9. >>>> >>>> Peter. >>>> >>>>> On 27/05/2015 6:09 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: >>>>> I'll check out that branch and take a look. Any tips on which tool chain >>>>> to use to compile it on a Windows 8.1 system? >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/26/2015 8:30 PM, Dennis Reedy wrote: >>>>>> Hi Patricia, >>>>>> >>>>>> I’ve done the work in the river/jtsk/skunk/qa-refactor-namespace branch, >>>>>> having eyes and hands on this would be great! >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Dennis >>>>>> >>>>>>> On May 26, 2015, at 1025PM, Patricia Shanahan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/2/2015 2:16 PM, Dennis Reedy wrote: >>>>>>>> The vote for the namespace change from com.sun.jini and com.artima to >>>>>>>> org.apache.river has passed. I’ll begin this work in the >>>>>>>> skunk/qa_refactor branch. I might require assistance in testing, so >>>>>>>> volunteers would be appreciated. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is this the right time to volunteer? If so, what would you like me to >>>>>>> do? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Patricia >
