- I also though we had agreed to take the ‘examples’ folder out of the JTSK.
Cheers, Greg > On Jan 9, 2016, at 3:05 PM, Greg Trasuk <tras...@stratuscom.com> wrote: > > > I’ve only looked at the ‘apache-river-3.0.0.tar.gz’ archive. A few issues… > > - we can’t have jar files in the source distribution. Which means we have a > problem with ‘dep-libs’. You could either setup a separate download for > developers to retrieve, or just give a list of the libraries that are needed. > What I’d recommend is to modify the build script to use Apache Ivy to go get > the requisite libraries at build time. See the 2.2 branch for an example on > how to do this. > - as above for ‘test/lib’ > - The ‘tar_release_test’ folder should be removed > - There is a “LICENSE” and a “LICENSE.txt” file in the root of the > distribution. They’re identical - delete LICENSE.txt > - Same with NOTICE and NOTICE.txt. > - Both of the above will need to be reviewed when the jar files have been > sorted out. Also, we may need a different LICENSE and NOTICE file for the > binary convenience artifacts. > - ‘doap-river.rdf’ is not really specific to the 3.0.0 release, so it > shouldn’t be in the release artifact. > - ‘build.properties’ doesn’t have a license header. > - I’d remove the ‘nbproject’ folder myself - the project shouldn’t be > dependent on the IDE. Although we might want to include instructions on how > to open it in an IDE. > - I could be wrong on this, but I think the current recommendation is to not > include a “KEYS” file, but for the release manager to register his/her keys > on ‘id.apache.org’. > > Cheers, > > Greg Trasuk > >> On Jan 8, 2016, at 6:56 AM, Peter Firmstone <peter.firmst...@zeus.net.au> >> wrote: >> >> The Apache River 3.0.0 Release candidate is available here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~peter_firmstone/ >> >> Voting on this release will commence in 4 weeks, to allow time for people to >> check they can reproduce these artifacts and test their code and report back >> with any issues. >> >> The code is currently in trunk, this will be branched after the 4 week >> review period and Voting passes. >> >> See also http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html >> >> Regards, >> >> Peter. >
