Gregg: So, you’re saying I shouldn’t review the release candidate? Sorry, but the bit about “no jars in the source distribution” is Apache policy. We can’t release with the candidate we have. This isn’t a technical quarrel.
Cheers, Greg Trasuk > On Jan 9, 2016, at 3:16 PM, Gregg Wonderly <ge...@cox.net> wrote: > > I sent Greg Trasuk a private note asking him to cease and desist on public > badgering and instead to just step back and let the community vote on what > happens with River, as that is the process that is supposed to work. I > suggested that if he had a plan and members to vote that plan through, that > he could have things however he wanted. I really do not appreciate his > attitude and lack of appreciation for the experience and expertise that > others have which is different from his own. I don’t want to badger or > belittle him in any way. But, we need to use this process and work through > issues by using our brains and our experiences both. The “web” as we know > it, is “mobile code” just like Jini uses. Javascript won, because it was > controlled by the browser camp, not by Sun. Applets were in the browser > first, but the size of PCs memory and computational resources were no where > near mature enough for Java to have won. I know, I tried to deploy lots of > Java in Applets and applications in that time, to the desktop, but there was > just not enough money spent on desktop machines in the enterprises where my > customers were. I am, hopefully going to get back out of the .Net world and > back into Java and Jini again, this coming year. I am looking forward to > that! > > Gregg > >> On Jan 8, 2016, at 5:56 AM, Peter Firmstone <peter.firmst...@zeus.net.au> >> wrote: >> >> The Apache River 3.0.0 Release candidate is available here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~peter_firmstone/ >> >> Voting on this release will commence in 4 weeks, to allow time for people to >> check they can reproduce these artifacts and test their code and report back >> with any issues. >> >> The code is currently in trunk, this will be branched after the 4 week >> review period and Voting passes. >> >> See also http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html >> >> Regards, >> >> Peter. >
