On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 1:19 AM, Harbs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why not publish both versions? > It looks like the js only is going to be just a zip file. That makes for easy maintenance. The swf version has a bunch of dependencies to be downloaded. Not a big deal, just thinking out loud if we really need to publish two different packages that might lead to confusion. I'm open to both, though. Thanks, Om > > > On Oct 30, 2017, at 10:15 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I was wondering if we should publish the apache.royale-jsonly verson via > > npm instead of the full version with swf support. > > After all, users coming in vial npm would most likely not expect swf > > support. > > > > Any thoughts on this proposal? > > > > Thanks, > > Om > >
