On 1/16/18, 9:16 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >> Royale is not going to operate like Flex. We want to be more responsive >> to our users. So instead of conducting detailed searches for IP issues >>at >> release time, they should be done at commit time or at other times. > >The issue has been brought up before so is a known issue. (See that >discussion thread). Given that discussion I would of assumed that >committers wouldn't check in plain text CC-BY-SA licensed content. But I >guess people forget about it, I had even forgotten about that thread. If >you where watching the commits it would be very easy to miss the file(s) >in question as they also incorrectly had an ASF headers on them. But any >PMC member or committer could of noticed this, the fact that no one did >until now probably indicates how difficult it was to find. Perhaps it >would be better to deal with licensing issues when they are raised or >soon after - especially when a 3rd party doesn’t respond in a timely way? > >BTW the legal JIRA about CC-SA content is here [1] not sure if you >managed to find that when looking at the issue. Are you now claiming this content is under CC-BY-SA instead of just CC-BY? I did not see that. Where did you get that? Share-Alike (SA) has more restrictions than just CC-BY, AIUI. -Alex >
