OK, I am going to prepare RC2. On 1/18/18, 3:23 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Carlos Rovira" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
>Hi Alex, > >it's ok to remove both. We need to get a first release as soon as >possible. >People on twitter is ask us for this. >So First things first. >Thanks > >2018-01-18 11:00 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <[email protected]>: > >> Hi Carlos, >> >> I don't doubt that MDLExample is referred to often, however it may not >>be >> ok for us to bundle it in Royale releases. The problem is not the >>images, >> it is the bits of CSS and maybe some text content from HTML files that >>is >> the issue. Are you ok with us removing MDLExample and MDLBlogExample in >> this release? BTW, both MDLExample and MDLBlogExample seem to run fine >> for me on FireFox and Chrome. We will do a "git rm" on those folders >>and >> then fix up pom.xml and build.xml accordingly. If we get a favorable >> ruling we can do "git revert" and bring it back. If we have to handle >> MDLBlogExample as Category X, then in order to make it look exactly the >> same as Google's example, it will never be allowed in the Royale >>releases, >> but we could either make it easy for users to build those examples or >> download those examples from some other place on the internet. >> >> For MDLExample, we have the additional option of tweaking the component >> explorer to use different CSS and text. But that will take time so the >> thinking is that we should temporarily remove those two examples, get a >> release out and then figure out how to make it available to users. >> >> Thoughts? >> -Alex >> >> On 1/17/18, 4:24 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Carlos >>Rovira" >> <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >Hi, >> > >> >I think MDLExample is one of the most referred examples out there. I >> >couldn't follow all the discussion since I was busy with work and other >> >task in this project, but I read that we had some problems with >>images. We >> >can change the images for place holders. If there's some more problem I >> >don't know right now. >> > >> >About MDLBlogExample is unfinished and can be not released. I found >>some >> >blocking problems with CSS compiler when tried to complete. If can be >> >removed from release but maintain the code I think it would be ok. >> > >> >In the end, now we rely heavily in MDL, but we should work forward a >> >future >> >where we can deprecate that library in favor of our own UI component >>set >> >that could have the same appearance with a theme. >> > >> >Thanks >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >2018-01-17 10:28 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>: >> > >> >> Olaf, >> >> >> >> I'm against even for that. MDLExample should be always in release >> >>package. >> >> If I understand Alex's idea the things should be fixed in the commit >> >>time, >> >> so now we have release time. We had that issue for several releases, >>we >> >>can >> >> leave with it one more release. >> >> >> >> Thanks, Piotr >> >> >> >> >> >> 2018-01-17 10:24 GMT+01:00 Olaf Krueger <[email protected]>: >> >> >> >> > Hi Piotr, >> >> > just to make sure you don't get it wrong: >> >> > >> >> > The idea is to just remove it from the RC2 (So from the first >>Royale >> >> > release >> >> > at the end) just in order to have some more time to fix the >>IP/license >> >> > issues and so don't delay the release any longer. >> >> > >> >> > This does not mean that those examples aren't less important, of >> >>course!! >> >> > >> >> > If I understand Alex correctly, the idea is to have continuous >>release >> >> > cycles, e.g. every 2 or 4 weeks so that we can add the MDL_Example >> >>soon >> >> > again. >> >> > If I can do anything, I'd like to offer some help in order to fix >> >>those >> >> > issues. >> >> > >> >> > Is it already clear what we have to do to fix those issues? >> >> > If it's not so much effort we maybe could do it right now and keep >>it >> >> with >> >> > RC2? >> >> > >> >> > Just my thoughts, >> >> > Olaf >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Sent from: >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http% >> 3A%2F%2Fapache-ro >> >>yale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui% >> 40adobe.com >> >>%7C7cc65c14c3ee495fe57708d55da5537c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae >> d2c178decee1%7C >> >>0%7C0%7C636517887011629087&sdata=q5eKxiKAqUnEvkw8%2BvU0DD% >> 2BK%2BKsIk8GxKg >> >>pwCS1yzrI%3D&reserved=0 >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> >> >> >> Patreon: >> >>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https% >> 3A%2F%2Fwww.pat >> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >> %7C7cc65c14c3ee >> >>495fe57708d55da5537c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1% >> 7C0%7C0%7C6365178 >> >>87011629087&sdata=LwRduFSZa%2BNOPd3EJCHZc1Ht7EN5dzgULWvI6G >> ffUTQ%3D&reserv >> >>ed=0 >> >> >> >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https% >> 3A%2F%2Fwww.pat >> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com >> %7C7cc65c14c3ee >> >>495fe57708d55da5537c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1% >> 7C0%7C0%7C6365178 >> >>87011629087&sdata=LwRduFSZa%2BNOPd3EJCHZc1Ht7EN5dzgULWvI6G >> ffUTQ%3D&reserv >> >>ed=0>* >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >-- >> >Carlos Rovira >> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A% >> 2F%2Fabout.me%2 >> >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C7cc65c14c >> 3ee495fe57708d5 >> >5da5537c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63651 >> 7887011629087&s >> >data=EHt08YgZdLJoAP4%2Fw%2Bsgw6yBBn3VhnVhK2C4r7%2F1pVw%3D&reserved=0 >> >> -- >> Carlos Rovira >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me% >>2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce7a0715cc8d49938fa208 >>d55e65eefa%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63651871426708661 >>8&sdata=jfzj9vo7UXXku65c3U4JEBukaRgQz8WTaNdvpRidNHY%3D&reserved=0 >> >> >>
