Hi Carlos,

It may not be required by policy, but the first 5 Apache project websites
I went to all had download links for the source package on their download
page, and any "Source" page pointed to the project's repos.

Apache's only official products are source code releases, not binary
artifacts.  I think we have to list the source package on the downloads
page.  I did see that one project listed the binaries before the source so
maybe we can do that.  We want to direct people to our repos as well, but
they are not releases.

I think we have the option of having our download link redirect to the
GitHub releases page if that makes sense.

And as Piotr pointed out, there are 3 repos bundled into each release
artifact so the "Source" page should reference all 3 repos and the
"Downloads" reference the package that contains all 3 repos.

Again, this is why I keep thinking we need a separate
user-facing/marketing site and domain that is distinct from royale.a.o
which is more tuned to attracting new committers.

My 2 cents,
-Alex


On 1/30/18, 2:49 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

>No, I'm talking about this page:
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Froyale.apa
>che.org%2Fsource-code%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cafe5673656ea4
>92d967c08d567d00eff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636529065
>657298785&sdata=v3PxmC3CwRXMLbJgHZVj8HjpqyG%2BX%2Bno%2B7OrTixvYLs%3D&reser
>ved=0
>(link is the footer since its priority is low)
>
>For all: I updated as well the Home in the pre-production with the NPM
>info
>so you can check. I added the "NPM" link to footer menu as well, as it was
>some time ago before first website release.
>
>2018-01-30 11:34 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>:
>
>> Carlos,
>>
>> Are you refering by source code - specific TAG in the repository ? If
>>you
>> wanted to point to the sources you need to point sources for the all
>>three
>> repository. Point to the 0.9.0 released tag.
>>
>> But what is for on the Download page link to the sources ? Just to
>>address
>> other type of users ? If they want to come and help us we have GitHub
>>link
>> on our page.
>>
>> Thanks, Piotr
>>
>> 2018-01-30 11:20 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>:
>>
>> > Hi Alex,
>> >
>> > Thinking about this and I think is not right. We define Downloads page
>> with
>> > the following phrase:
>> >
>> > "Here you can find the binary distributions of Apache Royale SDK for
>>you
>> to
>> > download."
>> >
>> > the source is in the "source code" page and in the Github link.
>> >
>> > I think that's the right way, since we provide the separated spaces
>>to do
>> > that, and make it more clear for users coming
>> > (as I mentioned before, we should have two basic types of users,
>>people
>> > wanting to get the binaries to go fast without worry about more, and
>> > people more advanced, first will go to downloads, and second will go
>>to
>> > source code page or directly to gihub link.
>> >
>> > But, We should change the source code page with the links to the
>>source
>> > code bundles.
>> > @Andrew can you provide a text and right links to source code so I can
>> make
>> > the same and put in Source code page?
>> >
>> > thanks
>> >
>> >
>> > 2018-01-30 7:23 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <[email protected]>:
>> >
>> > > IMO, we need to list the source package first.  Apache is about
>>source.
>> > >
>> > > This is why I still think about a marketing site and domain that is
>> more
>> > > like the other JS frameworks out there.
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Carlos Rovira
>> > 
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%
>>2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cafe5673656ea492d967c08
>>d567d00eff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63652906565729878
>>5&sdata=GQobmSWy%2BnwN9rCu0Bu%2BGi77vSqDAikjTOkF11%2Byc%2FA%3D&reserved=0
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: 
>>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cafe5673656ea
>>492d967c08d567d00eff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6365290
>>65657298785&sdata=hGxX4SM9Ob4E5FSSOWnKuR50L3aBmHw7u76s4tl9GxQ%3D&reserved
>>=0
>> 
>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cafe5673656ea
>>492d967c08d567d00eff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6365290
>>65657298785&sdata=hGxX4SM9Ob4E5FSSOWnKuR50L3aBmHw7u76s4tl9GxQ%3D&reserved
>>=0>*
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Carlos Rovira
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
>Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cafe5673656ea492d967c08d5
>67d00eff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636529065657298785&s
>data=GQobmSWy%2BnwN9rCu0Bu%2BGi77vSqDAikjTOkF11%2Byc%2FA%3D&reserved=0

Reply via email to