FTR, most of the work (using the dependency list and scope 'theme') was done by Christofer Dutz. It just needed to be hooked up to the app template.
-Alex On 2/24/18, 8:22 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Carlos Rovira" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >Hi Alex, > >just moved vivid theme to themes folder and change dependency to "theme", >so cool! > >Thanks for making this change! :) > >2018-02-24 16:36 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: > >> Hi, >> >> thanks! that make the trick I was missing: >> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>com.adobe.flash.framework</groupId> >> <artifactId>playerglobal</artifactId> >> <version>${flash.version}</version> >> <type>swc</type> >> <scope>provided</scope> >> </dependency> >> >> I'll be moving vivid theme to themes soon, maybe even with a change of >> name I was thinking. But this better go in other thread >> >> Thanks >> >> >> 2018-02-23 21:26 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>: >> >>> Weird. Do you have playerglobal here >>> -> .m2\repository\com\adobe\flash\framework\playerglobal\ ? >>> >>> 2018-02-23 21:08 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: >>> >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > since Alex made changes to how builds are done I always make JS >>>version. >>> > Now I'm trying to make SWF version with maven >>> > >>> > With vivid, as is a library I think I don't have to make anything, >>>since >>> > the output is an SWC >>> > >>> > with VividExample I change in pom.xml <targets>JSRoyale</targets> >>> > to <targets>JSRoyale, SWF</targets>, or even removing JSRoyale at all >>> > >>> > if I put only SWF in targets my result in console is: >>> > >>> > Loading configuration: >>> > /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/ >>> > examples/royale/VividExample/target/compile-app- >>> > config.xml >>> > >>> > Error: Missing builtin type Object >>> > >>> > >>> > Error: Unable to build SWF >>> > /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/ >>> > examples/royale/VividExample/target/VividExample- >>> > 0.9.2-SNAPSHOT.swf >>> > >>> > What could be the problem here? what is the missing object, could the >>> > compiler let us know what missing object expect? >>> > >>> > Right now vividexample has versions of 4 html components so I think >>>is >>> ok, >>> > even if I remove the use of the 4 controls and left the application >>>with >>> > only a view it behaves the same >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Carlos Rovira >>> > >>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me >>>%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C568aaf11b98642e5934d >>>08d57ba2d1ed%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63655086159875 >>>1539&sdata=au6vJwiyB9Vm5fcFWfyvnsIvTUoygmisgtVqIC7QuTY%3D&reserved=0 >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Piotr Zarzycki >>> >>> Patreon: >>>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pa >>>treon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C568aaf11b9 >>>8642e5934d08d57ba2d1ed%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6365 >>>50861598751539&sdata=eJY9T7eAj95IxaiuwPfwdDlbUotegL3cQ%2BhnvOk9%2F48%3D& >>>reserved=0 >>> >>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pa >>>treon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C568aaf11b9 >>>8642e5934d08d57ba2d1ed%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6365 >>>50861598751539&sdata=eJY9T7eAj95IxaiuwPfwdDlbUotegL3cQ%2BhnvOk9%2F48%3D& >>>reserved=0>* >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Carlos Rovira >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me% >>2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C568aaf11b98642e5934d08 >>d57ba2d1ed%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63655086159875153 >>9&sdata=au6vJwiyB9Vm5fcFWfyvnsIvTUoygmisgtVqIC7QuTY%3D&reserved=0 >> >> > > >-- >Carlos Rovira >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2 >Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C568aaf11b98642e5934d08d5 >7ba2d1ed%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636550861598751539&s >data=au6vJwiyB9Vm5fcFWfyvnsIvTUoygmisgtVqIC7QuTY%3D&reserved=0
