I’m a bit on the fence on putting thanks to companies paying employees to work on Royale. I’m much more comfortable with thanks for actual tools. It feels a bit “weird” to me, but I could probably go either way. In a certain sense, it might look better for the project to have more “thanks” listed there.
FWIW, my own company — PrintUI (which I’m an owner of) is paying both me and Yishay to work on Royale. Harbs > On Mar 29, 2018, at 8:58 AM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> wrote: > > Om, > > 2018-03-28 19:45 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > >> I wouldn't call them sponsors. There is an ASF level Sponsorship page [1] >> and this might conflict with that. >> >> I think a `Thanks to` page is fine. >> > > If you prefer that name is ok for me I'll change to it. I propose > "Sponsors" since sounds more appropriate to me, but "Thanks To" is ok > > >> >> Also, Adobe is seen twice :-) >> > > I said in my email that logos was not set yet. I didn't want to work on > that if there was some problem with this page. I only created a "draft" to > show the intention. As well texts only said why companies listed are there, > but not final text for the same reason > > >> >> And just as a disclaimer, you are the owner of Codescopic, right? >> >> > Right, but what do you want to say with that? ownership of a company is one > thing, I'm as well employee of my own company that is paying me to invest > time in this project, in the same way Adobe pay Peter and Alex. As well I > can choose to put some infrastructure resources of Codeoscopic to help this > project. > > Thanks > > > >> Thanks, >> Om >> >> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/sponsorship.html >> >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected] >>> >> wrote: >> >>> Carlos, >>> >>> I think you should wait a bit longer. I personally always wait about 48 >>> hours, due to time shifts it is the most reasonable. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Piotr >>> >>> 2018-03-28 18:32 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> so if there's no agree/disagree with the new sponsors page I assume I >> can >>>> go with it and complete? >>>> I'll wait a few hours >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> >>>> Carlos >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2018-03-28 0:33 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I created a draft page on website for this: >>>>> >>>>> * I called it "Sponsors", that are the companies or people we, the >> PMC >>>>> want to thank you as described here [1] >>>>> * Link is below in Royale first column menu in footer >>>>> * Since we need a new page that tis not home, I thought in what more >>>>> companies a side of BrowserStack we want to give thanks. I think >> about >>> 4 >>>>> for now, and maybe you can point more to list here. >>>>> * Let me know if you agree with the current list, is some other >> company >>>>> /people missed ?? >>>>> * I put some temporal logos to layout the page, first I want to know >> if >>>>> you agree >>>>> * texts are temporal as well, I put the main motivations why we are >>>> saying >>>>> thanks >>>>> >>>>> If you agree, I'll complete the page with logos and texts: >>>>> >>>>> https://royale.codeoscopic.com/sponsors/ >>>>> >>>>> thanks >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2018-03-27 10:56 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> Ok, I'll be doing that in the next few hours. >>>>>> thanks both >>>>>> >>>>>> 2018-03-27 10:40 GMT+02:00 Harbs <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the link to the guidelines. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Note that rel=“nofollow” is not actually a requirement. The only >>>>>>> requirement is to have a consistent policy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would probably create a thank you page on the Royale website and >>> link >>>>>>> to that page in the readme. (i.e. Thank you to our sponsors or >>> similar >>>> with >>>>>>> a link to the full page.) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Harbs >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mar 27, 2018, at 11:27 AM, Justin Mclean < >>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I contacted Browserstack to use the open source plan and it's ok >>> to >>>>>>> do so. >>>>>>>>> They only ask for us to put on our Github Readme page: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * an hyperlink to their site with his logo [1] >>>>>>>>> * and a line about how we use BrowserStack to help our project >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's ok to do so? Can I add it to our readme and finish the >>> process >>>>>>> to get >>>>>>>>> the OS license? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't think it would be permissible to put it in the readme but >>> it >>>>>>> can be placed on a thank you page [1] on the Apache Royale site. >> Note >>>> the >>>>>>> rel=“nofollow” requirement and the other (minor) conditions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Justin >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1. https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/linking#projectthanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Carlos Rovira >>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Carlos Rovira >>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Carlos Rovira >>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Piotr Zarzycki >>> >>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >>> >> > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira <http://about.me/carlosrovira>
