btw, this is the latest draft: https://royale.codeoscopic.com/thanks-to/
(again, logos and text are not final, and put what I found to quickly layout things, only the adobe logo is matching, but I'll use other we get the final consensus) thanks 2018-03-29 11:46 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: > Hi Piotr, > > I was updating the page to thanks to, adding PrintUI, then read your mail. > So go to add Prominic, NextGen (I assume you named Patreon but is not part > of what you want to add). > > Then I realized that both Prominic and NextGen are making great things for > this project and community, but when I want to put the "draft line" about > what we want to say to thank them I have a problem, since they are not > donating a service, a OS license, a time/person to this project... > > So Moonshine or NextGen are very related to Royale but not part of royale. > Are OS projects in their own and in part related to us. > > I think, and saw this some weeks ago (but still couldn't do it), to add a > page or section of IDEs with logos that supports Royale (IntelliJ, > VSCode+NextGenAS, Moonshine,..), the same way you did in > transpiledactionscript.org. I must do it soon for the website since is > important to Royale list those IDEs and community have that info clearly > posted in a relevant part of our website. > But regarding "Thank you" page, from them the only one that is donating, > IMHO, is IntelliJ with its OS license, (although even IntelliJ doesn't > support royale officials and Moonshine and NexGenAS are doing). > > For me seems to me more clear to put IDEs in their own page/section than > in a thank you page that as I interpret from the Apache guidelines "is a > way for PMCs to thank companies for services or things that they are doing > for us". > > Regarding what Justin says I think Apache is about individuals, but I'm > confident that this page is to thanks companies and/or individuals that > PMCs want to thank for services or other things they do for us. The first > line states: > > "PMCs may wish to provide recognition for third parties that provide > software or services to the project's committers to further the goals of > the project" > > So "third parties that provide software or services" are companies in most > of the cases. > > In the other hand to thank individuals, we already have the team page, > where we list PMCs and committers that are working and/or helping the > project in one way or another. > Here we can find all of us, plus people that was more involved in the past > (like Josh, Frederic or Erik), but are not currently involved or not > conjuncturaly > > > > > 2018-03-29 10:49 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>: > >> Hi Justin, >> >> Where are you suggesting to write ? What mailing list ? I think that would >> be an approach, because we have to make sure that it is not violation of >> some core rules of Apache. >> >> Thanks, >> Piotr >> >> 2018-03-29 10:46 GMT+02:00 Justin Mclean <[email protected]>: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > If you look at the guidelines it suggests that you only give thanks to >> > people who provide tools / infrastructure. IMO if you want to start >> listing >> > contributors companies then you would need to list the all of them and I >> > would also suggest you run this past fundraising. I’m not 100% sure but >> > mentioning companies in that context may not be in line with Apache's >> 501c >> > status. The ASF is about individuals not companies. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Justin >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >> > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
