If others agree, I’m fine with it. Harbs
> On Mar 29, 2018, at 11:22 AM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Harbs, > > my opinion is that is a bit a false modesty to not even list that Adobe, > Codeoscopic and PrintUI along IntelliJ and BrowserStack are donating both > Human Resources, services and infrastructure. > That doesn't hurt the project, just the opposite, since there are > individuals and companies that are betting for this project, while doesn't > compromise the main motive of its open source nature. > > The fact is that if Adobe don't pay Alex and Peter, we didn't have Royale > today, the same for Harbs and for me. In my case, if Codeoscopic don't pay > me I could not invest in make Jewel and Themes, so we'd not have such > feature at least for my part. So, as I said, I see only benefits in > recognize what they are donating. > > my 2 cnts > > > > 2018-03-29 10:12 GMT+02:00 Harbs <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > >> I’m a bit on the fence on putting thanks to companies paying employees to >> work on Royale. I’m much more comfortable with thanks for actual tools. It >> feels a bit “weird” to me, but I could probably go either way. In a certain >> sense, it might look better for the project to have more “thanks” listed >> there. >> >> FWIW, my own company — PrintUI (which I’m an owner of) is paying both me >> and Yishay to work on Royale. >> >> Harbs >> >>> On Mar 29, 2018, at 8:58 AM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Om, >>> >>> 2018-03-28 19:45 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>: >>> >>>> I wouldn't call them sponsors. There is an ASF level Sponsorship page >> [1] >>>> and this might conflict with that. >>>> >>>> I think a `Thanks to` page is fine. >>>> >>> >>> If you prefer that name is ok for me I'll change to it. I propose >>> "Sponsors" since sounds more appropriate to me, but "Thanks To" is ok >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Also, Adobe is seen twice :-) >>>> >>> >>> I said in my email that logos was not set yet. I didn't want to work on >>> that if there was some problem with this page. I only created a "draft" >> to >>> show the intention. As well texts only said why companies listed are >> there, >>> but not final text for the same reason >>> >>> >>>> >>>> And just as a disclaimer, you are the owner of Codescopic, right? >>>> >>>> >>> Right, but what do you want to say with that? ownership of a company is >> one >>> thing, I'm as well employee of my own company that is paying me to invest >>> time in this project, in the same way Adobe pay Peter and Alex. As well I >>> can choose to put some infrastructure resources of Codeoscopic to help >> this >>> project. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Om >>>> >>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/sponsorship.html >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Piotr Zarzycki < >> [email protected] >>>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Carlos, >>>>> >>>>> I think you should wait a bit longer. I personally always wait about 48 >>>>> hours, due to time shifts it is the most reasonable. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Piotr >>>>> >>>>> 2018-03-28 18:32 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> so if there's no agree/disagree with the new sponsors page I assume I >>>> can >>>>>> go with it and complete? >>>>>> I'll wait a few hours >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Carlos >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2018-03-28 0:33 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I created a draft page on website for this: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * I called it "Sponsors", that are the companies or people we, the >>>> PMC >>>>>>> want to thank you as described here [1] >>>>>>> * Link is below in Royale first column menu in footer >>>>>>> * Since we need a new page that tis not home, I thought in what more >>>>>>> companies a side of BrowserStack we want to give thanks. I think >>>> about >>>>> 4 >>>>>>> for now, and maybe you can point more to list here. >>>>>>> * Let me know if you agree with the current list, is some other >>>> company >>>>>>> /people missed ?? >>>>>>> * I put some temporal logos to layout the page, first I want to know >>>> if >>>>>>> you agree >>>>>>> * texts are temporal as well, I put the main motivations why we are >>>>>> saying >>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you agree, I'll complete the page with logos and texts: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://royale.codeoscopic.com/sponsors/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2018-03-27 10:56 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <[email protected]>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ok, I'll be doing that in the next few hours. >>>>>>>> thanks both >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2018-03-27 10:40 GMT+02:00 Harbs <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for the link to the guidelines. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Note that rel=“nofollow” is not actually a requirement. The only >>>>>>>>> requirement is to have a consistent policy. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I would probably create a thank you page on the Royale website and >>>>> link >>>>>>>>> to that page in the readme. (i.e. Thank you to our sponsors or >>>>> similar >>>>>> with >>>>>>>>> a link to the full page.) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Harbs >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 27, 2018, at 11:27 AM, Justin Mclean < >>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I contacted Browserstack to use the open source plan and it's ok >>>>> to >>>>>>>>> do so. >>>>>>>>>>> They only ask for us to put on our Github Readme page: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> * an hyperlink to their site with his logo [1] >>>>>>>>>>> * and a line about how we use BrowserStack to help our project >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It's ok to do so? Can I add it to our readme and finish the >>>>> process >>>>>>>>> to get >>>>>>>>>>> the OS license? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't think it would be permissible to put it in the readme but >>>>> it >>>>>>>>> can be placed on a thank you page [1] on the Apache Royale site. >>>> Note >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> rel=“nofollow” requirement and the other (minor) conditions. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> Justin >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 1. https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/linking#projectthanks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Carlos Rovira >>>>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Carlos Rovira >>>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Carlos Rovira >>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Piotr Zarzycki >>>>> >>>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >>>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Carlos Rovira >>> http://about.me/carlosrovira <http://about.me/carlosrovira> >>> <http://about.me/carlosrovira <http://about.me/carlosrovira>> >> > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira <http://about.me/carlosrovira>
