Carlos, How many classes you had to copy from Basic to Jewel so far ?
Piotr 2018-05-09 13:15 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>: > I fixed this. Now we have what we all want. > thanks > > 2018-05-09 13:01 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>: > > > btw, > > > > for a change like this I think you should pass maven to ensure nothing > > broken: > > > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: GoogleMaps ......... *SUCCESS* > > [ 1.042 s] > > > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: HTML ............... *FAILURE* > > [ 0.321 s] > > > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: HTML5 .............. *SKIPPED* > > > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: JQuery ............. *SKIPPED* > > > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Language ........... *SKIPPED* > > > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Material Design Lite *SKIPPED* > > > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Mobile ............. *SKIPPED* > > > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Reflection ......... *SKIPPED* > > > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Network ............ *SKIPPED* > > > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Storage ............ *SKIPPED* > > > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: XML ................ *SKIPPED* > > > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Text ............... *SKIPPED* > > > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: TLF ................ *SKIPPED* > > > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: RoyaleSite ......... *SKIPPED* > > > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: MXRoyale ........... *SKIPPED* > > > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Jewel 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT *SKIPPED* > > > > GroupBase is not a solution since doesn't have the nesting functionality. > > I think we have only one way: Pass Group to Core, since is really Core > > > > > > > > 2018-05-09 12:47 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>: > > > >> Hi > >> > >> the problem was that HTML library was baking Basic library only due to > >> "NodeElementBase extends Group" > >> was Harbs how told me that NodeElementBase was not need to extend Group. > >> Then I changed it and looking into examples for this change didn't see > >> problems. > >> > >> Is normal something arise now, so NodeElementBase must extends some kind > >> of Group. Did you try to simply try to extend GroupBase that is in core? > >> > >> @Harbs, about to revert I think you refer to this concrete one? right? > >> > >> We should continue looking if more problems arise, and try to go fixing > >> them. Sometimes the solution I did will be not right, in other cases, > can > >> be a matter of adapt you applications. Have in mind, that Apache Royale, > >> can be modeled against a single Application (yours) and must have the > >> general purpose in mind over the personal interest. So for me it's a > matter > >> of balance. The key point to pursue finaly is that we need separation of > >> Basic ui set from the rest of Royale to avoid to make people be charged > >> with things that are not really Core. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> 2018-05-09 11:29 GMT+02:00 yishayw <yishayj...@hotmail.com>: > >> > >>> I changed it back so NodeElementBase extends Group. Let's continue this > >>> discussion, but we need our app to work... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/ > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Carlos Rovira > >> http://about.me/carlosrovira > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
