Carlos, >From all of discussion I see only one advantage splitting Jewel from Basic. Results in size of package. That's why I'm asking about copied classes. It looks like we will have many copies of everything. If I create useful Bead and you need it you will copy it.
After all you did the changes, so discussion is closed. It will be good if you could look into the failing build after those changes if they were the cause. In my opinion if we reach 1.0 some day - Every changes in Core should be voted or waited till review on separate branch. Thanks, Piotr 2018-05-09 16:37 GMT+02:00 yishayw <yishayj...@hotmail.com>: > Hi Carlos, > > Just to get one thing out of the way, I changed NodeElementBase to extend > Group, not because I'm sure that's the way it should be permanently, but > because leaving your change as it was, was breaking our app which had > previously worked. > > Changes in base classes are always tricky, so I think it's a good thing > that > there's discussion and people feel obliged to voice their opinions and ask > questions. I think this should be encouraged. > > Personally, I don't feel I have a clear understanding of your motivation > here. What difference does it actually make to you which packages depend on > which? Can you give a specific example from Jewel where this makes a > difference? > > Excellent progress so far with Jewel, I think it's a difference maker. > > Yishay > > > > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/ > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
