This is another issue. You cannot build those examples using IDE. I think we should raise on GitHub. I also cannot build those examples in Moonshine. Something needs to be configured. Probably some additional args for compiler related to theme etc.
2018-05-17 13:18 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > VSCode using asconfigc > > > On May 17, 2018, at 12:57 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Harbs, > > > > How did you build the examples? Using VSCode or script ant/maven ? > > > > Thanks, > > Piotr > > > > 2018-05-17 11:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com <mailto: > harbs.li...@gmail.com>>: > > > >> FWIW, it looks to me like the only thing that will not work in the blog > >> post is <j:View> needs to be <js:View> and <j:TextPrompt> needs to be > >> <js:TextPromptBead> > >> > >> Although when I compile styles are definitely missing. > >> > >> Yeah. Jewel is definitely missing important pieces… :-( > >> > >> Harbs > >> > >>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> You are right. I missed this. > >>> > >>> What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work? > >>> > >>>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org > >> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>>> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I think you missed one important point I > >>>> posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are using the > >>>> actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3 without > all > >>>> that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we have: > >>>> > >>>> "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes. Jewel > will > >> be > >>>> available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the meanwhile > >> you > >>>> can find it in the develop branch." > >>>> > >>>> and the code is tailored with the actual api. > >>>> > >>>> For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it can ship > >> with > >>>> all that we are promising in website and social networks for the > latest > >> 2 > >>>> months. I think this is crucial. > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki < > https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki> > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/ > piotrzarzycki>>* > > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
