Hi Om, I have no objections to that. The question whether from the technical point of view Maven which is I believe big part of release process won't complain. We will see.
Thanks for confirmation, Piotr pt., 24 sie 2018 o 00:25 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > Yes, since 0.9.3 was already pushed out via npm [1], it would be best if we > skip to 0.9.4 > > Thanks, > Om > > [1] https://www.npmjs.com/package/@apache-royale/royale-js > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 1:53 PM Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > > It's been a while since last version of Royale was released. I would like > > to start process of releasing current version no matter in what state it > is > > right now. I know that we have probably unfinished discussion about some > > core changes. I'm suggesting leave it for the next release. I'm volunteer > > to be release manager. I will study carefully what we have here [1] and I > > hope to get help with all of the issues. > > > > I see that we have failing typedefs - I cleaned up workspace and run > build > > again. If #576 fail I will ask infra for advice. [2] > > > > Om, > > > > Do I need to know anything in case of release Royale to npm ? Your last > > suggestion here [3] is still up ? > > > > Alex, > > > > What about emulation branch - Can I merge it into develop ? > > > > Is there anything what can hold that release ? > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Release-Manager-Notes > > [2] https://builds.apache.org/job/royale-typedefs/ > > [3] > > > > > http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
