I will start experimenting with release process tomorrow. Depends how much
issues I will have I hope to start properly everything before the end of
the week.

I'm still wondering whether MXRoyale branch is good for merge.

Thanks,
Piotr

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018, 5:55 PM Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote:

> That's great Piotr!, Let's see if this fixes it now.
>
> I'd near to finish work and ComboBox/DropDownList, this and some issues on
> Tablet/List will be great to have in 0.9.3 to make people starting to use
> have solved this important issues. Hope I could get this working before
> starting the release process :)
>
> El lun., 27 ago. 2018 a las 16:03, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > I have switched two build on jenkins to "master" royale-asjs_jsonly and
> > royale-asjs - It seems that this fixes issue with build. - Not sure if it
> > can stay like that.
> >
> > I'm working right now to fix build for module Icons.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > pon., 27 sie 2018 o 15:06 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > I'm going to commit some changes to build.xml, if it won't work I will
> > > revert it.
> > >
> > > pon., 27 sie 2018 o 14:12 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > >> I looked into the current failing build [1]. It complaining that
> > "Basedir
> > >> c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs does not exist" and it would be
> > >> correct, because "royale-typedefs" is being build to that folder
> > "C:\Program
> > >> Files (x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs".
> > >>
> > >> Does anyone changed that and why ?
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >>
> http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs/
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Piotr
> > >>
> > >> niedz., 26 sie 2018 o 15:11 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> >
> > >> napisał(a):
> > >>
> > >>> I'm going to notify Infra about problem with build on b.a.o. Locally
> > >>> everything is perfectly fine. I will attach dev list and write email
> on
> > >>> us...@infra.apache.org.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Piotr
> > >>>
> > >>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 16:05 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > >>> napisał(a):
> > >>>
> > >>>> Great Piotr!,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> as you said discussion is not over, but I think we discussed almost
> > >>>> lots of
> > >>>> things and plans was left for releases "post 0.9.3". In fact I
> revert
> > >>>> package name changes that was the only point that was making us not
> > >>>> release
> > >>>> 0.9.3. So I think we are at this point safe to release 0.9.3, 0.9.4
> or
> > >>>> what
> > >>>> we want to call it :)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I must say that I'm this days wanting to finish some things in Jewel
> > >>>> that
> > >>>> will make it pretty usable in an stable way, for me that points are:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> * End Jewel Table and Jewel List remove and update data
> > >>>> * Jewel NumericStepper
> > >>>> * Jewel DropdownList/Combobox
> > >>>>
> > >>>> There's much more to do, but I think those three points will make
> many
> > >>>> people have the minimun to start working in real Apache Royale Jewel
> > >>>> apps
> > >>>> (at least is what I need to start a real project we have now for
> > Apache
> > >>>> Royale, so I'm working hard to complete these points).
> > >>>> I want to make this asap, so hope something of those point could go
> in
> > >>>> this
> > >>>> release :)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Carlos
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> El vie., 24 ago. 2018 a las 0:35, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > >>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
> > >>>> escribió:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> > Hi Om,
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > I have no objections to that. The question whether from the
> > technical
> > >>>> point
> > >>>> > of view Maven which is I believe big part of release process won't
> > >>>> > complain. We will see.
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Thanks for confirmation,
> > >>>> > Piotr
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > pt., 24 sie 2018 o 00:25 OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosma...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> > napisał(a):
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > > Yes, since 0.9.3 was already pushed out via npm [1], it would be
> > >>>> best if
> > >>>> > we
> > >>>> > > skip to 0.9.4
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > Thanks,
> > >>>> > > Om
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > [1] https://www.npmjs.com/package/@apache-royale/royale-js
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 1:53 PM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > >>>> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> > > wrote:
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> > > > Hi Guys,
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > It's been a while since last version of Royale was released. I
> > >>>> would
> > >>>> > like
> > >>>> > > > to start process of releasing current version no matter in
> what
> > >>>> state
> > >>>> > it
> > >>>> > > is
> > >>>> > > > right now. I know that we have probably unfinished discussion
> > >>>> about
> > >>>> > some
> > >>>> > > > core changes. I'm suggesting leave it for the next release.
> I'm
> > >>>> > volunteer
> > >>>> > > > to be release manager. I will study carefully what we have
> here
> > >>>> [1]
> > >>>> > and I
> > >>>> > > > hope to get help with all of the issues.
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > I see that we have failing typedefs - I cleaned up workspace
> and
> > >>>> run
> > >>>> > > build
> > >>>> > > > again. If #576 fail I will ask infra for advice. [2]
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > Om,
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > Do I need to know anything in case of release Royale to npm ?
> > >>>> Your last
> > >>>> > > > suggestion here [3] is still up ?
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > Alex,
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > What about emulation branch - Can I merge it into develop ?
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > Is there anything what can hold that release ?
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > [1]
> > >>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Release-Manager-Notes
> > >>>> > > > [2] https://builds.apache.org/job/royale-typedefs/
> > >>>> > > > [3]
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>>
> >
> http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > Thanks,
> > >>>> > > > --
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > >>>> > > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >>>> > > >
> > >>>> > >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > --
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > >>>> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> > --
> > >>>> > Carlos Rovira
> > >>>> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>> >
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>> Piotr Zarzycki
> > >>>
> > >>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > >>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Piotr Zarzycki
> > >>
> > >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to