Hi Piotr, thanks! :)
as I have some things on my plate, as I finish and upload I'll give a try, hopefully tomorrow. Since Harbs can test until Monday I think I have some room to fix some important points that I'd like to go in this release: * DateField : DateChooser popup doesn't close when user click outside. * Add Jewel ComboBox responsive capability * Fix Table selectedItem (since is not working as expected) * Fix some issues in DropDownList (selectedIndex is not triggering change event) I think those are important since people starting using Jewel can find this issues very problematic, and I think I'm about few hours to get this done, hopefully in this weekend. Thanks! El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 14:30, Piotr Zarzycki (< piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Guys, > > ANT and Maven build on branch is working right now. Please test your stuff. > > Carlos, > > Please take a look into RemoveTableItemRendererForArrayListData because I > have commented out that line. Probably something won't work. Let me know > how it's looks like. > If you won't have time next wee let me know I will test Jewel on my own on > Monday. > > Alina, > > I need your testing on that branch to make sure that I didn't break > anything. I have merged all stuff from MXRoyale, so basically there is > everything there. > > Harbs, > > I will be waiting for your changes which you have been talking about > earlier. > > Let's make this release happen! > > Thanks, > Piotr > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 13:23 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > napisał(a): > > > Harbs, > > > > Can you jump to feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop and try build there? It > > will help me with all of that. This branch contains merged develop and > > MXRoyale. > > I'm assuming you are using ANT. > > > > As for that line in DataGridView I have change it to DataGridColumnList. > > Please make changes if needed to something else on that branch. This > branch > > will be merged to develop once everyone tell me that I didn't break > > anything. :) > > > > Thanks, > > Piotr > > > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 13:16 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > > > >> The build passes for me on the latest develop branch using ant. > >> > >> Are you building with ant or maven? > >> > >> > On Aug 31, 2018, at 2:13 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > Scratch that. > >> > > >> > It does have an itemRenderer property and it inherits from > >> IItemRendererProvider > >> > > >> >> On Aug 31, 2018, at 1:18 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com <mailto: > >> harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> That change should be reverted. I added it to try and fix an issue > >> with Express, but Express data grids don’t mix with Basic columns. > >> >> > >> >>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Piotr Zarzycki < > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Hi Harbs, > >> >>> > >> >>> Some time ago you have added interface IDataGridColumnList [1]. It > is > >> used > >> >>> here [2], couple of lines later there is assignment > >> >>> > >> >>> list.itemRenderer = dataGridColumn.itemRenderer; > >> >>> > >> >>> But that interface doesn't have itemRenderer property and build is > >> >>> failing - locally. How actually it is working ? > >> >>> > >> >>> [1] > >> >>> > >> > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as > >> < > >> > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as > >> > > >> >>> [2] > >> >>> > >> > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229 > >> < > >> > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229 > >> > > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks, > >> >>> Piotr > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 10:33 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org > >> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> napisał(a): > >> >>> > >> >>>> Piotr, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> for me its ok, but only want to point something important. I think > >> we all > >> >>>> invested many emails, hours in discussing about this. I think all > >> positions > >> >>>> are clear. I think we can discuss if things to bring to the plate > >> are new, > >> >>>> but I'm afraid it could not be. My position is that we all can get > >> what we > >> >>>> want. I think is: 1) return things to basic 2) jewel can't link > >> basic, so > >> >>>> it must create it's own versions. In case this could not be > possible, > >> >>>> create a JewelCore SWC. My latest experience creating Jewel > versions > >> of > >> >>>> DateField, DateChooser, Table, ComboBox and DropDownList show that > I > >> was in > >> >>>> the right track, since the things I copied are modified for Jewel > >> since > >> >>>> Jewel needs other things and implementations. In Basic there's too > >> much of > >> >>>> the styles and view hardcoded in the main code and that means that > >> this > >> >>>> kind of code, for me, never can be generalistic piece of code that > >> could be > >> >>>> reusable for all UIs. As well it seems Basic UI, TLCs and CSS don't > >> want to > >> >>>> be separated and anyone wanting to extend it will need to deal with > >> those > >> >>>> dependencies, what is not acceptable. Framework code should help > you > >> to put > >> >>>> the Pilars of other high level things without the need of looking > >> how to > >> >>>> workaround many things set up, this is what I find in Basic code > when > >> >>>> trying to use in Jewel. It could be a way if things could be change > >> in > >> >>>> Basic for the better, but seems that many people here things that > >> Basic is > >> >>>> now in a near-final-shape, so no changes means, (I at least), can > >> use it. > >> >>>> And Jewel can't use. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Don't see other way. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Let's see this as we end this release. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Thanks > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Carlos > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 7:27, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >> >>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>) > >> >>>> escribió: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> Hi Carlos, > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Please do not move anything more. I think I had enough problems > with > >> >>>>> current situations. I will deal with all of that as is. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> My suggestion is to restart discussion about all of that stuff > after > >> >>>>> release. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Thanks, > >> >>>>> Piotr > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:18 AM Carlos Rovira < > >> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> > >> >>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> Hi, > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> as we discussed, the package names was the revert we said to do, > so > >> >>>> when > >> >>>>> we > >> >>>>>> do a refactor of that package names, will be more consistent. > >> >>>>>> Regarding movement of pieces, in the case of DataGroup I can move > >> it > >> >>>> from > >> >>>>>> Core to Basic and create a version for Jewel. > >> >>>>>> Let me know if this is ok for you. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> As well let me know if some more class is in Core to consider. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Thanks > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 19:18, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >> >>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>) > >> escribió: > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> I was also thinking that this release won't have that changes, > but > >> >>>>>>> unfortunately they are there. I had big headache to make it > >> working. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Thank you Alex. I will try to deal with all of that. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 19:12 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid > >> <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid>> > >> >>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> I fixed the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale and merged it into > >> the > >> >>>>>>>> integration branch. However, the Maven build in the > integration > >> >>>>> branch > >> >>>>>>> is > >> >>>>>>>> still failing. It appears to be because DataGroup got moved > from > >> >>>>> Basic > >> >>>>>>> to > >> >>>>>>>> Core. The Ant build should be failing there too. I was under > >> the > >> >>>>>>>> impression that these sorts of changes were not going to be in > >> this > >> >>>>>>>> release. Someone else will have to deal with resolving these > >> >>>> issues. > >> >>>>>> I > >> >>>>>>>> don’t want to stop my other work to figure them out. > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >>>>>>>> -Alex > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> > >> >>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Great! Thanks Alex! > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 18:05 Alex Harui > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid > >> <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> I will fix the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale then you can > >> >>>>> pull > >> >>>>>>>> those > >> >>>>>>>>> changes into the integration branch. > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> -Alex > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 7:42 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > >> >>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Nope. I build repo only using ANT. Do you know how to fix > >> >>>>>> that > >> >>>>>>> ? > >> >>>>>>>>> Probably I > >> >>>>>>>>> missed some conflicts, not sure why Maven complaining. :) > >> >>>>> If > >> >>>>>>> you > >> >>>>>>>> won't > >> >>>>>>>>> have > >> >>>>>>>>> time I will look into that tomorrow. > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >>>>>>>>> Piotr > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 16:24 Carlos Rovira < > >> >>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> I switched to the feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop > >> >>>>>>>>>> then try to pass maven and fails just at the begining > >> >>>>>>>>>> I saw that has 2 rat check fails, so I fixed it > >> >>>>>>>>>> but now I'm seeing more problems > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> > /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): > >> >>>>>>>>>> col: 18 Error: interface method numItemRenderers in > >> >>>>>> interface > >> >>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent not implemented by class DataGroup > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea > >> >>>>>>>> implements > >> >>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> ^ > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> > /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): > >> >>>>>>>>>> col: 18 interface method numItemRenderers in interface > >> >>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent > >> >>>>>>>>>> not implemented by class DataGroup > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea > >> >>>>>>>> implements > >> >>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> ^ > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> 1.666093134 seconds > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> > *------------------------------------------------------------------------* > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary:* > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Parent > >> >>>> 0.9.3-SNAPSHOT > >> >>>>>> .... > >> >>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > >> >>>>>>>>>> 2.164 s] > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework > >> >>>>>> ........................... > >> >>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > >> >>>>>>>>>> 0.273 s] > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Fonts > >> >>>>>> .................... > >> >>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > >> >>>>>>>>>> 1.175 s] > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs > >> >>>>>> ..................... > >> >>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ > >> >>>>>>>>>> 0.691 s] > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Core > >> >>>>>> ............... > >> >>>>>>>>> *FAILURE* [ > >> >>>>>>>>>> 1.947 s] > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Binding > >> >>>>>> ............ > >> >>>>>>>>> *SKIPPED* > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> So I'm a bit confused. I thought the branch was > >> >>>> compiling > >> >>>>>> and > >> >>>>>>>> tested > >> >>>>>>>>> to > >> >>>>>>>>>> some point, but it seems that conflicts are still > >> >>>>> unsolved. > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> For example in this error, seems MXRoyale introduced > >> >>>> some > >> >>>>>> MX > >> >>>>>>>> API > >> >>>>>>>>> that is > >> >>>>>>>>>> not in Royale core classes until now, so it needs to > >> >>>> add > >> >>>>>> it. > >> >>>>>>>> For now > >> >>>>>>>>> it > >> >>>>>>>>>> only reports this fails, but maybe when it reach Basic > >> >>>>>>> library > >> >>>>>>>> it > >> >>>>>>>>> could be > >> >>>>>>>>>> much more than that...so my question is, did you try to > >> >>>>>>>> compile with > >> >>>>>>>>> maven > >> >>>>>>>>>> the branch? if so did you find this problems? > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Or maybe I'm missing something? > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Let me know in order to know how to operate. I'll > >> >>>> return > >> >>>>> to > >> >>>>>>> my > >> >>>>>>>> Jewel > >> >>>>>>>>> duties > >> >>>>>>>>>> in the meanwhile > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks! > >> >>>>>>>>>> Carlos > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 16:04, Carlos Rovira (< > >> >>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> ) > >> >>>>>>>>>> escribió: > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> of course, I'll try all Jewel examples and report if > >> >>>> I > >> >>>>>> find > >> >>>>>>>> some > >> >>>>>>>>> isuue. > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 15:33, Piotr Zarzycki (< > >> >>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >>) > >> escribió: > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alina, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working on preparation to release next version > >> >>>> of > >> >>>>>>>> Royale. One > >> >>>>>>>>> of the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> steps were to merge everything what is in MXRoyale > >> >>>>>> branch > >> >>>>>>> to > >> >>>>>>>>> develop. I > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> just finished it and everything what was in MXRoyale > >> >>>>> and > >> >>>>>>>> develop > >> >>>>>>>>> now is > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> being merged to special branch > >> >>>>>>>> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Before I merge all that stuff back to develop I > >> >>>> would > >> >>>>>> like > >> >>>>>>>> to ask > >> >>>>>>>>> you to > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> switch to that branch and test on your end - > >> >>>> whether I > >> >>>>>>>> didn't > >> >>>>>>>>> break any > >> >>>>>>>>>> of > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> your stuff. Is something is being missed - please > >> >>>> make > >> >>>>>>>> changes and > >> >>>>>>>>>> commit > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> to that branch. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Can you switch to that branch as well and test some > >> >>>>>> Jewel > >> >>>>>>>>> examples ? > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I will try to build Tour De Flex tomorrow to see > >> >>>> what > >> >>>>> is > >> >>>>>>>> happen. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> wt., 28 sie 2018 o 19:18 Carlos Rovira < > >> >>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the recommended way is to create a integration > >> >>>>> branch, > >> >>>>>>>> moreover > >> >>>>>>>>> since > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> MXRoyale has gone many time in its own way. Then > >> >>>>> solve > >> >>>>>>>>> conflicts in > >> >>>>>>>>>> that > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch until you see is stable and all is > >> >>>> compiling > >> >>>>>> and > >> >>>>>>>> working > >> >>>>>>>>> fine > >> >>>>>>>>>> as > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> expected, then merge into develop the integration > >> >>>>>>> branch. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Good luck! :) > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> El mar., 28 ago. 2018 a las 19:00, Alex Harui > >> >>>>>>>>>> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ) > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Master and agent have their own root folders for > >> >>>>>>>> projects. I > >> >>>>>>>>> think > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Agent > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is running in c:\Jenkins\workspace and master > >> >>>> may > >> >>>>> be > >> >>>>>>>> running > >> >>>>>>>>> in > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> wherever > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> APPDATA is pointing. In theory, royale-compiler > >> >>>>> and > >> >>>>>>>>> royale-typedefs > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be able to be built off master, and the > >> >>>>>> other > >> >>>>>>>> builds > >> >>>>>>>>> should > >> >>>>>>>>>> be > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> able > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use Ant variables to point to the results of > >> >>>>>> those > >> >>>>>>>>> builds. If > >> >>>>>>>>>> you > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> want > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to try switching everything off master to the > >> >>>>> agent > >> >>>>>>>> that's > >> >>>>>>>>> fine as > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> well. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For me, there were some builds that would not > >> >>>> run > >> >>>>> on > >> >>>>>>>> master. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/18, 9:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > >> >>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see failing mustellaresultsparser [1] [2] > >> >>>>>> It's > >> >>>>>>>>> pointing for > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> some > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reason > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to c:/jenkins/workspace instead those one in > >> >>>>>>> Program > >> >>>>>>>>> Files. How > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> this > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> path > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is appear there ? What actually is > >> >>>>>>> ${env.APPDATA} ? > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *[1] ** > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 > >> < > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 > >> < > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *[2] > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0 > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0 > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Thanks,* > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Piotr* > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:18 Piotr Zarzycki < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Harbs, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please give me some sign here once you > >> >>>> will > >> >>>>> be > >> >>>>>>>> done > >> >>>>>>>>> with all > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> your > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes! > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:12 Harbs < > >> >>>>>>>> harbs.li...@gmail.com> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have found that there’s an error with > >> >>>> ACE > >> >>>>>> on > >> >>>>>>>> multiple > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> machines. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only able to get it to build by first > >> >>>>> running > >> >>>>>>>> ant on > >> >>>>>>>>> the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> typedefs > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo and > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then the asjs repo succeeded. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my Mac, it worked fine, so I’m not > >> >>>>> really > >> >>>>>>>> sure what > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> triggered > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this is related to the failures on > >> >>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci? > >> >>>>>>>>>> Dunno… > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I plan on making sure the current develop > >> >>>>>>> branch > >> >>>>>>>> works > >> >>>>>>>>> for me > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> and > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixing > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any issues that might crop up in the next > >> >>>>>>> couple > >> >>>>>>>> of > >> >>>>>>>>> days. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is also some code which needs to be > >> >>>>>>>>> cherry-picked from > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert-refactor branch. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:25 PM, Alex Harui > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought I'd sent an email about this, > >> >>>>>> but I > >> >>>>>>>> can't > >> >>>>>>>>> find it > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> so I > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason, some weeks ago, the > >> >>>>> builds > >> >>>>>>>> began to > >> >>>>>>>>> fail > >> >>>>>>>>>> on > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci. The only way I was able > >> >>>> to > >> >>>>>> fix > >> >>>>>>>> it was > >> >>>>>>>>> to > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> create a > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jenkins > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent and move builds that needed the > >> >>>>> screen > >> >>>>>>> (to > >> >>>>>>>> run > >> >>>>>>>>> tests) > >> >>>>>>>>>> to > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In theory, royale-compiler and > >> >>>>>> royale-typedefs > >> >>>>>>>> should > >> >>>>>>>>> still > >> >>>>>>>>>> be > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> able > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the master build agent. Any build issues > >> >>>>>> here > >> >>>>>>>> are > >> >>>>>>>>> probably a > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter of > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting the right Ant variables in place. > >> >>>>> I > >> >>>>>>>> think it > >> >>>>>>>>> did all > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> work > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at one > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point in time after I made the agent. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, I think this issue is > >> >>>>>> independent > >> >>>>>>>> of any > >> >>>>>>>>> issues > >> >>>>>>>>>> on > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> build.a.o > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Maven. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding releasing in general, I have > >> >>>> a > >> >>>>>>> slight > >> >>>>>>>>> preference > >> >>>>>>>>>> to > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wait a > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit until I get more of Tour De Flex > >> >>>>> working, > >> >>>>>>>> but if > >> >>>>>>>>> I'm not > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> RM > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't have to spend time figuring out the > >> >>>>>> merge > >> >>>>>>>> from > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale to > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop, it doesn't matter to me. I was > >> >>>>> also > >> >>>>>>>>> pondering just > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> releasing from > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/27/18, 7:03 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have switched two build on jenkins > >> >>>>> to > >> >>>>>>>> "master" > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs_jsonly > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs - It seems that this > >> >>>> fixes > >> >>>>>>>> issue with > >> >>>>>>>>>> build. - > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Not > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can stay like that. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working right now to fix build > >> >>>> for > >> >>>>>>>> module > >> >>>>>>>>> Icons. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 15:06 Piotr > >> >>>>>> Zarzycki < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to commit some changes to > >> >>>>>>>> build.xml, if > >> >>>>>>>>> it won't > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> work > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert it. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 14:12 Piotr > >> >>>>> Zarzycki < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I looked into the current failing > >> >>>> build > >> >>>>>>> [1]. > >> >>>>>>>> It > >> >>>>>>>>>> complaining > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Basedir > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs > >> >>>>> does > >> >>>>>>> not > >> >>>>>>>>> exist" and > >> >>>>>>>>>> it > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct, because "royale-typedefs" is > >> >>>>>> being > >> >>>>>>>> build > >> >>>>>>>>> to that > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> folder > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "C:\Program > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Files > >> >>>>>>>> (x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs". > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone changed that and why ? > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&reserved=0 > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&reserved=0 > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> niedz., 26 sie 2018 o 15:11 Piotr > >> >>>>>> Zarzycki > >> >>>>>>> < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to notify Infra about > >> >>>>> problem > >> >>>>>>> with > >> >>>>>>>>> build on > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> b.a.o. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Locally > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything is perfectly fine. I will > >> >>>>>>> attach > >> >>>>>>>> dev > >> >>>>>>>>> list and > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> write > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> email > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us...@infra.apache.org <mailto: > >> >>>>>>>>> us...@infra.apache.org>. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 16:05 Carlos > >> >>>>> Rovira < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great Piotr!, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as you said discussion is not over, > >> >>>>>> but I > >> >>>>>>>> think > >> >>>>>>>>> we > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> discussed > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> almost > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things and plans was left for > >> >>>>> releases > >> >>>>>>>> "post > >> >>>>>>>>> 0.9.3". In > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> fact I > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package name changes that was the > >> >>>>> only > >> >>>>>>>> point > >> >>>>>>>>> that was > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> making > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> us not > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3. So I think we are at this > >> >>>>> point > >> >>>>>>>> safe to > >> >>>>>>>>> release > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.4 > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we want to call it :) > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I must say that I'm this days > >> >>>> wanting > >> >>>>>> to > >> >>>>>>>> finish > >> >>>>>>>>> some > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> things > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Jewel > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will make it pretty usable in an > >> >>>>> stable > >> >>>>>>>> way, for > >> >>>>>>>>> me > >> >>>>>>>>>> that > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> points are: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * End Jewel Table and Jewel List > >> >>>>> remove > >> >>>>>>> and > >> >>>>>>>>> update data > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel NumericStepper > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel DropdownList/Combobox > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's much more to do, but I > >> >>>> think > >> >>>>>>> those > >> >>>>>>>> three > >> >>>>>>>>> points > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> will > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> make > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people have the minimun to start > >> >>>>>> working > >> >>>>>>>> in real > >> >>>>>>>>> Apache > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale Jewel > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (at least is what I need to start a > >> >>>>>> real > >> >>>>>>>> project > >> >>>>>>>>> we > >> >>>>>>>>>> have > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> now > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale, so I'm working hard to > >> >>>>> complete > >> >>>>>>>> these > >> >>>>>>>>> points). > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to make this asap, so hope > >> >>>>>>>> something of > >> >>>>>>>>> those > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> point > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> could go > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release :) > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 24 ago. 2018 a las 0:35, > >> >>>>> Piotr > >> >>>>>>>> Zarzycki > >> >>>>>>>>> (< > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ) > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Om, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have no objections to that. The > >> >>>>>>> question > >> >>>>>>>>> whether > >> >>>>>>>>>> from > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of view Maven which is I believe > >> >>>> big > >> >>>>>>> part > >> >>>>>>>> of > >> >>>>>>>>> release > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> process > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complain. We will see. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for confirmation, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 00:25 OmPrakash > >> >>>>>>>> Muppirala < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bigosma...@gmail.com > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, since 0.9.3 was already > >> >>>> pushed > >> >>>>>> out > >> >>>>>>>> via > >> >>>>>>>>> npm [1], > >> >>>>>>>>>> it > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best if > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skip to 0.9.4 > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&reserved=0 > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&reserved=0 > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 1:53 PM > >> >>>>> Piotr > >> >>>>>>>> Zarzycki > >> >>>>>>>>> < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >> >>>> <mailto: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a while since last > >> >>>>> version > >> >>>>>>> of > >> >>>>>>>>> Royale was > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> released. I > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to start process of releasing > >> >>>>>> current > >> >>>>>>>> version > >> >>>>>>>>> no > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> matter > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right now. I know that we have > >> >>>>>>> probably > >> >>>>>>>>> unfinished > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> core changes. I'm suggesting > >> >>>> leave > >> >>>>>> it > >> >>>>>>>> for the > >> >>>>>>>>> next > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. I'm > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be release manager. I will > >> >>>>> study > >> >>>>>>>> carefully > >> >>>>>>>>> what > >> >>>>>>>>>> we > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> have > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> here > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope to get help with all of the > >> >>>>>>> issues. > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see that we have failing > >> >>>>> typedefs > >> >>>>>> - > >> >>>>>>> I > >> >>>>>>>>> cleaned up > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> workspace and > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again. If #576 fail I will ask > >> >>>>> infra > >> >>>>>>> for > >> >>>>>>>>> advice. [2] > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do I need to know anything in > >> >>>> case > >> >>>>>> of > >> >>>>>>>> release > >> >>>>>>>>> Royale > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> to > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm ? > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your last > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggestion here [3] is still up > >> >>>> ? > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex, > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about emulation branch - > >> >>>> Can > >> >>>>> I > >> >>>>>>>> merge it > >> >>>>>>>>> into > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> develop ? > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything what can hold > >> >>>>> that > >> >>>>>>>> release ? > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&reserved=0 > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&reserved=0 > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&reserved=0 > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&reserved=0 > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>> -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
