Scratch that. It does have an itemRenderer property and it inherits from IItemRendererProvider
> On Aug 31, 2018, at 1:18 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That change should be reverted. I added it to try and fix an issue with > Express, but Express data grids don’t mix with Basic columns. > >> On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Harbs, >> >> Some time ago you have added interface IDataGridColumnList [1]. It is used >> here [2], couple of lines later there is assignment >> >> list.itemRenderer = dataGridColumn.itemRenderer; >> >> But that interface doesn't have itemRenderer property and build is >> failing - locally. How actually it is working ? >> >> [1] >> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as >> >> <https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as> >> [2] >> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229 >> >> <https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229> >> >> Thanks, >> Piotr >> >> >> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 10:33 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org >> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> napisał(a): >> >>> Piotr, >>> >>> for me its ok, but only want to point something important. I think we all >>> invested many emails, hours in discussing about this. I think all positions >>> are clear. I think we can discuss if things to bring to the plate are new, >>> but I'm afraid it could not be. My position is that we all can get what we >>> want. I think is: 1) return things to basic 2) jewel can't link basic, so >>> it must create it's own versions. In case this could not be possible, >>> create a JewelCore SWC. My latest experience creating Jewel versions of >>> DateField, DateChooser, Table, ComboBox and DropDownList show that I was in >>> the right track, since the things I copied are modified for Jewel since >>> Jewel needs other things and implementations. In Basic there's too much of >>> the styles and view hardcoded in the main code and that means that this >>> kind of code, for me, never can be generalistic piece of code that could be >>> reusable for all UIs. As well it seems Basic UI, TLCs and CSS don't want to >>> be separated and anyone wanting to extend it will need to deal with those >>> dependencies, what is not acceptable. Framework code should help you to put >>> the Pilars of other high level things without the need of looking how to >>> workaround many things set up, this is what I find in Basic code when >>> trying to use in Jewel. It could be a way if things could be change in >>> Basic for the better, but seems that many people here things that Basic is >>> now in a near-final-shape, so no changes means, (I at least), can use it. >>> And Jewel can't use. >>> >>> Don't see other way. >>> >>> Let's see this as we end this release. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Carlos >>> >>> >>> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 7:27, Piotr Zarzycki (< >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>) >>> escribió: >>> >>>> Hi Carlos, >>>> >>>> Please do not move anything more. I think I had enough problems with >>>> current situations. I will deal with all of that as is. >>>> >>>> My suggestion is to restart discussion about all of that stuff after >>>> release. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Piotr >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:18 AM Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org >>>> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> as we discussed, the package names was the revert we said to do, so >>> when >>>> we >>>>> do a refactor of that package names, will be more consistent. >>>>> Regarding movement of pieces, in the case of DataGroup I can move it >>> from >>>>> Core to Basic and create a version for Jewel. >>>>> Let me know if this is ok for you. >>>>> >>>>> As well let me know if some more class is in Core to consider. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 19:18, Piotr Zarzycki (< >>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>) escribió: >>>>> >>>>>> I was also thinking that this release won't have that changes, but >>>>>> unfortunately they are there. I had big headache to make it working. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you Alex. I will try to deal with all of that. >>>>>> >>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 19:12 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid >>>>>> <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid>> >>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>> >>>>>>> I fixed the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale and merged it into the >>>>>>> integration branch. However, the Maven build in the integration >>>> branch >>>>>> is >>>>>>> still failing. It appears to be because DataGroup got moved from >>>> Basic >>>>>> to >>>>>>> Core. The Ant build should be failing there too. I was under the >>>>>>> impression that these sorts of changes were not going to be in this >>>>>>> release. Someone else will have to deal with resolving these >>> issues. >>>>> I >>>>>>> don’t want to stop my other work to figure them out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Great! Thanks Alex! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 18:05 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid >>>>>>> <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >>>> >>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I will fix the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale then you can >>>> pull >>>>>>> those >>>>>>>> changes into the integration branch. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 7:42 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope. I build repo only using ANT. Do you know how to fix >>>>> that >>>>>> ? >>>>>>>> Probably I >>>>>>>> missed some conflicts, not sure why Maven complaining. :) >>>> If >>>>>> you >>>>>>> won't >>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>> time I will look into that tomorrow. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 16:24 Carlos Rovira < >>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I switched to the feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop >>>>>>>>> then try to pass maven and fails just at the begining >>>>>>>>> I saw that has 2 rat check fails, so I fixed it >>>>>>>>> but now I'm seeing more problems >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): >>>>>>>>> col: 18 Error: interface method numItemRenderers in >>>>> interface >>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent not implemented by class DataGroup >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea >>>>>>> implements >>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ^ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): >>>>>>>>> col: 18 interface method numItemRenderers in interface >>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent >>>>>>>>> not implemented by class DataGroup >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea >>>>>>> implements >>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ^ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1.666093134 seconds >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> *------------------------------------------------------------------------* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary:* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Parent >>> 0.9.3-SNAPSHOT >>>>> .... >>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >>>>>>>>> 2.164 s] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework >>>>> ........................... >>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >>>>>>>>> 0.273 s] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Fonts >>>>> .................... >>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >>>>>>>>> 1.175 s] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs >>>>> ..................... >>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >>>>>>>>> 0.691 s] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Core >>>>> ............... >>>>>>>> *FAILURE* [ >>>>>>>>> 1.947 s] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Binding >>>>> ............ >>>>>>>> *SKIPPED* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So I'm a bit confused. I thought the branch was >>> compiling >>>>> and >>>>>>> tested >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> some point, but it seems that conflicts are still >>>> unsolved. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For example in this error, seems MXRoyale introduced >>> some >>>>> MX >>>>>>> API >>>>>>>> that is >>>>>>>>> not in Royale core classes until now, so it needs to >>> add >>>>> it. >>>>>>> For now >>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>> only reports this fails, but maybe when it reach Basic >>>>>> library >>>>>>> it >>>>>>>> could be >>>>>>>>> much more than that...so my question is, did you try to >>>>>>> compile with >>>>>>>> maven >>>>>>>>> the branch? if so did you find this problems? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Or maybe I'm missing something? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Let me know in order to know how to operate. I'll >>> return >>>> to >>>>>> my >>>>>>> Jewel >>>>>>>> duties >>>>>>>>> in the meanwhile >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>> Carlos >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 16:04, Carlos Rovira (< >>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> of course, I'll try all Jewel examples and report if >>> I >>>>> find >>>>>>> some >>>>>>>> isuue. >>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 15:33, Piotr Zarzycki (< >>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>) >>>>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alina, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm working on preparation to release next version >>> of >>>>>>> Royale. One >>>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>>>>> steps were to merge everything what is in MXRoyale >>>>> branch >>>>>> to >>>>>>>> develop. I >>>>>>>>>>> just finished it and everything what was in MXRoyale >>>> and >>>>>>> develop >>>>>>>> now is >>>>>>>>>>> being merged to special branch >>>>>>> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Before I merge all that stuff back to develop I >>> would >>>>> like >>>>>>> to ask >>>>>>>> you to >>>>>>>>>>> switch to that branch and test on your end - >>> whether I >>>>>>> didn't >>>>>>>> break any >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>> your stuff. Is something is being missed - please >>> make >>>>>>> changes and >>>>>>>>> commit >>>>>>>>>>> to that branch. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Can you switch to that branch as well and test some >>>>> Jewel >>>>>>>> examples ? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I will try to build Tour De Flex tomorrow to see >>> what >>>> is >>>>>>> happen. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wt., 28 sie 2018 o 19:18 Carlos Rovira < >>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> >>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> the recommended way is to create a integration >>>> branch, >>>>>>> moreover >>>>>>>> since >>>>>>>>>>>> MXRoyale has gone many time in its own way. Then >>>> solve >>>>>>>> conflicts in >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>> branch until you see is stable and all is >>> compiling >>>>> and >>>>>>> working >>>>>>>> fine >>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>> expected, then merge into develop the integration >>>>>> branch. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Good luck! :) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> El mar., 28 ago. 2018 a las 19:00, Alex Harui >>>>>>>>> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Master and agent have their own root folders for >>>>>>> projects. I >>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>> Agent >>>>>>>>>>>>> is running in c:\Jenkins\workspace and master >>> may >>>> be >>>>>>> running >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>> wherever >>>>>>>>>>>>> APPDATA is pointing. In theory, royale-compiler >>>> and >>>>>>>> royale-typedefs >>>>>>>>>>>>> should be able to be built off master, and the >>>>> other >>>>>>> builds >>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>> able >>>>>>>>>>>>> to use Ant variables to point to the results of >>>>> those >>>>>>>> builds. If >>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>>>>>> to try switching everything off master to the >>>> agent >>>>>>> that's >>>>>>>> fine as >>>>>>>>>>> well. >>>>>>>>>>>>> For me, there were some builds that would not >>> run >>>> on >>>>>>> master. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, >>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/18, 9:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I see failing mustellaresultsparser [1] [2] >>>>> It's >>>>>>>> pointing for >>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>> reason >>>>>>>>>>>>> to c:/jenkins/workspace instead those one in >>>>>> Program >>>>>>>> Files. How >>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>> path >>>>>>>>>>>>> is appear there ? What actually is >>>>>> ${env.APPDATA} ? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *[1] ** >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 >>> >>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>>>>> *[2] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Thanks,* >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Piotr* >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:18 Piotr Zarzycki < >>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Harbs, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please give me some sign here once you >>> will >>>> be >>>>>>> done >>>>>>>> with all >>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>> changes! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:12 Harbs < >>>>>>> harbs.li...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have found that there’s an error with >>> ACE >>>>> on >>>>>>> multiple >>>>>>>>>>> machines. >>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only able to get it to build by first >>>> running >>>>>>> ant on >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> typedefs >>>>>>>>>>>>> repo and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then the asjs repo succeeded. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my Mac, it worked fine, so I’m not >>>> really >>>>>>> sure what >>>>>>>>>>> triggered >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this is related to the failures on >>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci? >>>>>>>>> Dunno… >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I plan on making sure the current develop >>>>>> branch >>>>>>> works >>>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> fixing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any issues that might crop up in the next >>>>>> couple >>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> days. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is also some code which needs to be >>>>>>>> cherry-picked from >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert-refactor branch. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:25 PM, Alex Harui >>>>>>>>>>>> <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought I'd sent an email about this, >>>>> but I >>>>>>> can't >>>>>>>> find it >>>>>>>>>>> so I >>>>>>>>>>>>> guess >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason, some weeks ago, the >>>> builds >>>>>>> began to >>>>>>>> fail >>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci. The only way I was able >>> to >>>>> fix >>>>>>> it was >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> create a >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jenkins >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent and move builds that needed the >>>> screen >>>>>> (to >>>>>>> run >>>>>>>> tests) >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> agent. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In theory, royale-compiler and >>>>> royale-typedefs >>>>>>> should >>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>> able >>>>>>>>>>>>> to use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the master build agent. Any build issues >>>>> here >>>>>>> are >>>>>>>> probably a >>>>>>>>>>>>> matter of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting the right Ant variables in place. >>>> I >>>>>>> think it >>>>>>>> did all >>>>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>>>>> at one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point in time after I made the agent. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, I think this issue is >>>>> independent >>>>>>> of any >>>>>>>> issues >>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>> build.a.o >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Maven. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding releasing in general, I have >>> a >>>>>> slight >>>>>>>> preference >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> wait a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit until I get more of Tour De Flex >>>> working, >>>>>>> but if >>>>>>>> I'm not >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> RM >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't have to spend time figuring out the >>>>> merge >>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop, it doesn't matter to me. I was >>>> also >>>>>>>> pondering just >>>>>>>>>>>>> releasing from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/27/18, 7:03 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have switched two build on jenkins >>>> to >>>>>>> "master" >>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs_jsonly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs - It seems that this >>> fixes >>>>>>> issue with >>>>>>>>> build. - >>>>>>>>>>>> Not >>>>>>>>>>>>> sure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can stay like that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working right now to fix build >>> for >>>>>>> module >>>>>>>> Icons. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 15:06 Piotr >>>>> Zarzycki < >>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to commit some changes to >>>>>>> build.xml, if >>>>>>>> it won't >>>>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>>>>> I will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 14:12 Piotr >>>> Zarzycki < >>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I looked into the current failing >>> build >>>>>> [1]. >>>>>>> It >>>>>>>>> complaining >>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Basedir >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs >>>> does >>>>>> not >>>>>>>> exist" and >>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct, because "royale-typedefs" is >>>>> being >>>>>>> build >>>>>>>> to that >>>>>>>>>>>> folder >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "C:\Program >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Files >>>>>>> (x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone changed that and why ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> niedz., 26 sie 2018 o 15:11 Piotr >>>>> Zarzycki >>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to notify Infra about >>>> problem >>>>>> with >>>>>>>> build on >>>>>>>>>>> b.a.o. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Locally >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything is perfectly fine. I will >>>>>> attach >>>>>>> dev >>>>>>>> list and >>>>>>>>>>>> write >>>>>>>>>>>>> email >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us...@infra.apache.org <mailto: >>>>>>>> us...@infra.apache.org>. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 16:05 Carlos >>>> Rovira < >>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great Piotr!, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as you said discussion is not over, >>>>> but I >>>>>>> think >>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>> discussed >>>>>>>>>>>>> almost >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things and plans was left for >>>> releases >>>>>>> "post >>>>>>>> 0.9.3". In >>>>>>>>>>>> fact I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package name changes that was the >>>> only >>>>>>> point >>>>>>>> that was >>>>>>>>>>> making >>>>>>>>>>>>> us not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3. So I think we are at this >>>> point >>>>>>> safe to >>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3, >>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we want to call it :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I must say that I'm this days >>> wanting >>>>> to >>>>>>> finish >>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>> things >>>>>>>>>>>>> in Jewel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will make it pretty usable in an >>>> stable >>>>>>> way, for >>>>>>>> me >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> points are: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * End Jewel Table and Jewel List >>>> remove >>>>>> and >>>>>>>> update data >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel NumericStepper >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel DropdownList/Combobox >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's much more to do, but I >>> think >>>>>> those >>>>>>> three >>>>>>>> points >>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>> make >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people have the minimun to start >>>>> working >>>>>>> in real >>>>>>>> Apache >>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale Jewel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (at least is what I need to start a >>>>> real >>>>>>> project >>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>> now >>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale, so I'm working hard to >>>> complete >>>>>>> these >>>>>>>> points). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to make this asap, so hope >>>>>>> something of >>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>> point >>>>>>>>>>>>> could go >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 24 ago. 2018 a las 0:35, >>>> Piotr >>>>>>> Zarzycki >>>>>>>> (< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto: >>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Om, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have no objections to that. The >>>>>> question >>>>>>>> whether >>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of view Maven which is I believe >>> big >>>>>> part >>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>> process >>>>>>>>>>>>> won't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complain. We will see. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for confirmation, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 00:25 OmPrakash >>>>>>> Muppirala < >>>>>>>>>>>>> bigosma...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, since 0.9.3 was already >>> pushed >>>>> out >>>>>>> via >>>>>>>> npm [1], >>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>> would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skip to 0.9.4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 1:53 PM >>>> Piotr >>>>>>> Zarzycki >>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>> <mailto: >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a while since last >>>> version >>>>>> of >>>>>>>> Royale was >>>>>>>>>>>>> released. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to start process of releasing >>>>> current >>>>>>> version >>>>>>>> no >>>>>>>>>>> matter >>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right now. I know that we have >>>>>> probably >>>>>>>> unfinished >>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> core changes. I'm suggesting >>> leave >>>>> it >>>>>>> for the >>>>>>>> next >>>>>>>>>>>>> release. I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be release manager. I will >>>> study >>>>>>> carefully >>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>> here >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope to get help with all of the >>>>>> issues. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see that we have failing >>>> typedefs >>>>> - >>>>>> I >>>>>>>> cleaned up >>>>>>>>>>>>> workspace and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again. If #576 fail I will ask >>>> infra >>>>>> for >>>>>>>> advice. [2] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do I need to know anything in >>> case >>>>> of >>>>>>> release >>>>>>>> Royale >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> npm ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your last >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggestion here [3] is still up >>> ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about emulation branch - >>> Can >>>> I >>>>>>> merge it >>>>>>>> into >>>>>>>>>>>> develop ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything what can hold >>>> that >>>>>>> release ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o79uh3p5m2RnjzBKkftGdU3XPAg51Mi46x0km7tw8m8%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o79uh3p5m2RnjzBKkftGdU3XPAg51Mi46x0km7tw8m8%3D&reserved=0 >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki> >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>>* >
